Skip to main content

Behavioral Explanation versus Structural Explanation in Learning by Model-Building

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10948))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4899 Accesses

Abstract

How students learn modeling skills and concepts of system dynamics through building models was investigated, focusing on how students’ behavior and understanding are influenced by the type of assistance and their prior knowledge. We implemented a function in a model-building learning environment that detects the difference between a model by students and the correct model and gives one of the two types of feedback: structural explanation which indicates structurally erroneous parts of a model by students to promote model completion, while behavioral explanation which suggests erroneous behavior of a model by students to promote reflection on the cause of error. Our experiment revealed: (1) Students assigned to structural explanation showed high model completion, but their understanding depended on whether they used feedback appropriately or not. (2) Students assigned to behavioral explanation showed less model completion, but once they completed models, they acquired a deeper understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beek, W., Bredeweg, B.: Context-dependent help for novices acquiring conceptual systems knowledge in DynaLearn. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 292–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Beek, W., Bredeweg, B.: Providing feedback for common problems in learning by conceptual modeling using expectation-driven consistency maintenance. In: Proceedings of QR12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N.: Learning by teaching: a new agent paradigm for educational software. Appl. Artif. Intell. 19, 363–392 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravo, C., van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T.: Modeling and simulation in inquiry learning: checking solutions and giving intelligent advice. Simulation 82(11), 769–784 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bredeweg, B., Linnebank, F., Bouwer, A., Liem, J.: Garp3 - workbench for qualitative modelling and simulation. Ecol. Inform. 4(5–6), 263–281 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forbus, K.D., Carney, K., Sherin, B.L., Ureel II, L.C.: VModel: a visual qualitative modeling environment for middle-school students. AI Mag. 26, 63–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gracia, J., Liem, J., Lozano, E., Corcho, O., Trna, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Bredeweg, B.: Semantic techniques for enabling knowledge reuse in conceptual modelling. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, Jeff Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6497, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17749-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Horiguchi, T., Hirashima, T., Forbus, K.D.: A Model-Building Learning Environment with Explanatory Feedback to Erroneous Models. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 620–621. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Horiguchi, T., Masuda, T.: Evaluation of the function that detects the difference of learner’s model from the correct model in a model-building learning environment. In: Yamamoto, S. (ed.) HIMI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10274, pp. 40–49. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58524-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. isee systems STELLA (1985). http://www.iseesystems.com/

  11. Vanlehn, K., Wetzel, J., Grover, S., Van De Sande, B.: Learning how to construct models of dynamic systems: an initial evaluation of the dragoon intelligent tutoring system. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(2), 154–167 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weld, D.S., deKleer, J.: Readings in Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoya Horiguchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Horiguchi, T., Masuda, T., Tomoto, T., Hirashima, T. (2018). Behavioral Explanation versus Structural Explanation in Learning by Model-Building. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93845-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93846-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics