Skip to main content

Fast Incremental Conformance Analysis for Interactive Process Discovery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 320))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Interactive process discovery allows users to specify domain knowledge while discovering process models with the help of event logs. Typically the coherence of an event log and a process model is calculated using conformance analysis. Many state-of-the-art conformance techniques emphasize on the correctness of the results, and hence can be slow, impractical and undesirable in interactive process discovery setting, especially when the process models are complex. In this paper, we present a framework (and its application) to calculate conformance fast enough to guide the user in interactive process discovery. The proposed framework exploits the underlying techniques used for interactive process discovery in order to incrementally update the conformance results. We trade the accuracy of conformance for performance. However, the user is also provided with some diagnostic information, which can be useful for decision making in an interactive process discovery setting. The results show that our approach can be considerably faster than the traditional approaches and hence better suited in an interactive setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.promtools.org/doku.php?id=nightly.

  2. 2.

    https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:915d2bfb-7e84-49ad-a286-dc35f063a460.

  3. 3.

    http://www.win.tue.nl/bpi/2011/challenge.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing petri nets for process mining: a generic approach. Distrib. Parallel Databases 31(4), 471–507 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: 2011 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 55–64. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards robust conformance checking. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 122–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20511-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M., Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., Baesens, B., Vanthienen, J.: Event-based real-time decomposed conformance analysis. In: Meersman, R., Panetto, H., Dillon, T., Missikoff, M., Liu, L., Pastor, O., Cuzzocrea, A., Sellis, T. (eds.) OTM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8841, pp. 345–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45563-0_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmona, J.: The alignment of formal, structured and unstructured process descriptions. In: van der Aalst, W., Best, E. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10258, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57861-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. de Leoni, M., Maggi, F.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Aligning event logs and declarative process models for conformance checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Desel, J., Esparza, J.: Free Choice Petri Nets, vol. 40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Esparza, J.: Synthesis rules for Petri nets, and how they lead to new results. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Klop, J.W. (eds.) CONCUR 1990. LNCS, vol. 458, pp. 182–198. Springer, Heidelberg (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0039060

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 66–78. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Scalable process discovery and conformance checking. Software & Systems Modeling, July 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mannhardt, F., Blinde, D.: Analyzing the trajectories of patients with sepsis using process mining. In: RADAR+EMISA, vol. 1859, pp. 72–80 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Single-Entry Single-Exit decomposed conformance checking. Inf. Syst. 46, 102–122 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf. Syst. 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taymouri, F., Carmona, J.: Model and event log reductions to boost the computation of alignments (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taymouri, F., Carmona, J.: A recursive paradigm for aligning observed behavior of large structured process models. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 197–214. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Vázquez-Barreiros, B., van Zelst, S.J., Buijs, J.C.A.M., Lama, M., Mucientes, M.: Repairing alignments: striking the right nerve. In: Schmidt, R., Guédria, W., Bider, I., Guerreiro, S. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD-2016. LNBIP, vol. 248, pp. 266–281. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39429-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Verbeek, H.M.W.: Decomposed replay using hiding and reduction as abstraction. In: Koutny, M., Kleijn, J., Penczek, W. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XII. LNCS, vol. 10470, pp. 166–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55862-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Munoz-Gama, J.: Divide and conquer: a tool framework for supporting decomposed discovery in process mining. Comput. J. 60(11), 1649–1674 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Dixit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dixit, P.M., Buijs, J.C.A.M., Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2018). Fast Incremental Conformance Analysis for Interactive Process Discovery. In: Abramowicz, W., Paschke, A. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93930-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93931-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics