Skip to main content

A Causal Explanatory Model of Bayesian-belief Networks for Analysing the Risks of Opening Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2018)

Abstract

Open government data initiatives result in the expectation of having open data available. Nevertheless, some potential risks like sensitivity, privacy, ownership, misinterpretation, and misuse of the data result in the reluctance of governments to open their data. At this moment, there is no comprehensive overview nor a model to understand the mechanisms resulting in risk when opening data. This study is aimed at developing a Bayesian-belief Networks (BbN) model to analyse the causal mechanism resulting in risks when opening data. An explanatory approach based on the four main steps is followed to develop a BbN. The model presents a better understanding of the causal relationship between data and risks and can help governments and other stakeholders in their decision to open data. We use the literature review base to quantify the probability of risk variables to give an illustration in the interrogating process. For the further study, we recommend using expert’s judgment for quantifying the probability of the risk variables in opening data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luthfi, A., Janssen, M.: A conceptual model of decision-making support for opening data. In: Katsikas, Sokratis K., Zorkadis, V. (eds.) e-Democracy 2017. CCIS, vol. 792, pp. 95–105. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali-Eldin, A.M.T., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Opening more data: a new privacy scoring model of open data. In: Seventh International Symposium on Business Modelling and Software Design (BMSD 2017), Barcelona, Spain. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publication, Lda (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lourenço, R.P.: An analysis of open government portals: a perspective of transparency for accountability. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 323–332 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(1), 17–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Towards decision support for disclosing data: closed or open data? Inf. Polity 20(2–3), 103–107 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barry, E., Bannister, F.: Barriers to open data release: a view from the top. Inf. Polity 19(1–2), 129–152 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenton, N., Neil, M.: Risks Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks. CRC Press, Noca Raton (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nadkarni, S., Shenoy, P.P.: A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks. Decis. Support Syst. 38(2), 259–281 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, H., Elrafey, A.H., Kerschberg, L.: Using modular ontologies to capture causal knowledge contained in Bayesian networks. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference. ACM, Sydney (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herland, K., Hämmäinen, H., Kekolahti, P.: Information security risks assessment of smartphones using Bayesian networks. J. Cyber Secur. 4, 65–85 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraborty, S., et al.: A Bayesian network-based customer satisfaction model: a tool for management decisions in railway transport. J. Decis. Anal. 3(4), 2–24 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hudson, L.D., et al.: An Application of Bayesian Networks to Antiterrorism Risk Management for Military Planners (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gulvanessian, H., Holický, M.: Determination of actions due to fire: recent developments in Bayesian risk assessment of structures under fire. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 3(4), 346–352 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cornalba, C., Giudici, P.: Statistical models for operational risk management. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 388(1–2), 166–172 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, K., et al.: Applying Bayesian belief networks to health risks assessment. Stochast. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 26(3), 451–465 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., David, C.: Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Inf. Polity 19(2–3), 17–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barnickel, N., et al.: Berlin open data strategy: organisational, legal and technical aspects of open data in Berlin. In: Concept, Pilot System and Recommendations for Action (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, S., et al.: Risk analysis to overcome barriers to open data. Electron. J. e-Gov. 11(1), 348–359 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, D., Zhao, H.: Data security and privacy protection issues in cloud computing. In: International Conference and Privacy Protection Issues in Cloud Computing, pp. 647–651. IEEE Computer Society, Hangzhou (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dekkers, M., et al.: Data and Metadata Licensing, O.D. Support, Editor. European Comission (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walter, S.: Heterogeneous database integration in biomedicine. J. Biomed. Inf. 34(4), 285–298 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amit, S.P., Larson, J.A.: Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput. Surv. 22(3), 183–236 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yannoukakou, A., Araka, I.: Access to government information: right to information and open government data synergy. In: 3rd International Conference on Integrated Information (IC-ININFO), vol. 147, pp. 332–340 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tran, E., Scholtes, G.: Open Data Literature Review. Barkeley School of Law, University of California (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Okediji, R.L.: Government as owner of intellectual property? Considerations for public welfare in the era of big data. Vanderbilt J. Entertain. Technol. Law 18(8), 331 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uhlir, P.F.: The Socioeconomic Effects of Public Sector Information on Digital Networks: Toward a Better Understanding of Different Access and Reuse Policies. National Research Council, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Luthfi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Luthfi, A., Janssen, M., Crompvoets, J. (2018). A Causal Explanatory Model of Bayesian-belief Networks for Analysing the Risks of Opening Data. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94213-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94214-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics