Abstract
ICT (Information and Communication Technology) is crucial to enhancing the quality of higher education by improving students’ learning effectiveness and enriching their learning experiences. People are now concerned about the quality, efficiency, effectiveness, and return on investment (ROI) of how ICT is applied in higher education. Performance evaluation is an effective way to solve this problem, with the exceptional advantage of promoting sustainable development. In this paper, a 4-Dimension Performance Evaluation Model and corresponding course-related Performance Evaluation Indicator System in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) case are proposed to evaluate how ICT is applied in higher education. Our case study with three MOOCs shows that our model and indicator system are helpful in measuring the current status of ICT in higher education while providing suggestions and directions to help the course become more “mature” and lead it to a new stage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The New Media Consortium: Horizon Report (2017 Higher Education Edition). http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
The New Media Consortium: Horizon Report (2016 Higher Education Edition). http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
The 2007 National Survey of Information Technology in US Higher Education. http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/CCP_US/C071029G.pdf
The CEO Forum School Technology and Readiness Report. http://www.ceoforum.org
Trucano, M.: Knowledge maps: ICTs in education. infoDev/World Bank, Washington, DC (2005)
International Telecommunication Union: Partnership on measuring ICT for development—core ICT indicators, Geneva (2010)
Zuo, X.M.: Literature review of ICT in schools by BECTA. Distance Educ. China 11, 11–16 (2011). (in Chinese)
Department of Education and Science: ICT in schools. Evaluation Support and Research Unit, Marlborough (2008)
Nicol, D., Coen, M.: A model for evaluating the institutional costs and benefits of ICT initiatives in teaching and learning in higher education. Res. Learn. Technol. 11(2), 46–60 (2003)
Laurillard, D.: Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. High. Educ. 54(1), 21–39 (2007)
Rajev, M.K.G.: A performance evaluation of ICT infrastructure in the academic environment. Asian J. Res. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 7(4), 320–333 (2017)
Man, K.: An evaluation model on ICT tools performance in university’s industrial activities: with special concerns on university’s organizational characteristics and the academic staff’s motivations. In: Abstracts of Annual Conference of Japan Society for Management Information, pp. 123–126 (2013)
Lu, C., Li, L.L., Wu, D.: Application of combination weighting method to weight calculation in performance evaluation of ICT. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 258–259 (2015)
Ma, N., Yu, S.Q.: The process assessment and capability maturity model for educational informationization of schools. J. Distance Educ. 1, 13–17 (2010)
Stolovich, H.D., Keeps, E.J.: Handbook of Human Performance Technology, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer, San Francisco (1999)
Zheng, Y., Xie, Y.: Metamodel for evaluating the performance of ICT in education. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L.-F., Shang, J., Wang, A., Kwan, R. (eds.) ICBL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9757, pp. 207–218. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41165-1_19
Software Engineering Institute. The Capability Maturity Model–Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York (1995)
Skylar, T.: 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit. Des. 84(1), 116–121 (2014)
Li, Q., Liu, N.: Towards a MOOC quality assurance framework. Open Educ. Res. 21(5), 66–73 (2015). (in Chinese)
Rosewell, J., Darco, J.: The OpenupEd quality label: benchmarks for MOOCs. Int. J. Innov. Qual. Learn. 2(3), 88–100 (2014)
Lowenthal, P.R., Hodges, C.B.: In search of quality: using quality matters to analyze the quality of massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 16(5), 83–101 (2015)
Klobas, J.E.: Measuring the success of scalable open online courses. Perform. Meas. Metrics 15(3), 145–162 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province under grant 2014A030313427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zheng, Y., Li, H., Zheng, T. (2018). Performance Evaluation of ICT-Based Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. In: Cheung, S., Kwok, Lf., Kubota, K., Lee, LK., Tokito, J. (eds) Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success. ICBL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10949. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94504-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94505-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)