Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

From the Internet of Things to an Internet of Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Internet of Things

Part of the book series: Internet of Things ((ITTCC))

  • 1404 Accesses

Abstract

In his ground-breaking work on the habitus Bourdieu (Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, 1977, [4]) understands practices as the permanent internalization of the social order in the human body. Others have taken this idea and described practices as ‘normatively regulated activities’ (Schmidt K, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP) [28]). Our own interests here arise from the fact that during the performance of all of these various activities, which may implicate and draw upon the material environment, the surrounding context, their own capabilities, interests and preferences, people often use supportive devices and technologies that help to enable and support their realization. Where these supportive technologies make up a part of the Internet of Things (IoT) they are usually small, interconnected cyber-physical devices and are typically used in social/collaborative settings. As a consequence, the (re-)appropriation of these new devices and technologies is not only a technical, but also a social process. Within this exploratory paper we focus on the potential of IoT technologies for supporting collaborative appropriation within Communities of Practice (CoP) from a practice-oriented perspective. We outline the vision of an Internet of Practices (IoP). This vision encompasses and addresses a range of phenomena that has been associated with how CoPs evolve and the resonance activities that can arise as specific bodies of practice adapt, by adding integrated support for the documentation of practices and the sharing of relevant representations such that mutual improvements in practice may take place. Based on our vision of the IoP, we outline some directions CSCW research could take regarding the potential of the IoT and new emerging technologies, thereby expanding the scope of CSCW’s areas of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashton, K. (2009). That “Internet of Things” thing. RFiD Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atzori, L., Lera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). Internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks2, 54(15), 2787–2805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balka, E., & Wagner, I. (2006). Making things work: Dimensions of configurability as appropriation work. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 229–238). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180912.

  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castellani, S., Grasso, A., O’Neill, J., & Roulland, F. (2009). Designing technology as an embedded resource for troubleshooting. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18(2–3), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-008-9088-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609356938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crabtree, A., O’Neill, J., Tolmie, P., Castellani, S., Colombino, T., & Grasso, A. (2006). The practical indispensability of articulation work to immediate and remote help-giving. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 219–228). https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180910.

  9. Dalton, N., MacKay, G., & Holland, S. (2012). Kolab: Appropriation & Improvisation in Mobile Tangible Collaborative Interaction. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 21–24). Newcastle, UK: ACM New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317960.

  10. Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026149119426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gantt, M., & Nardi, B. B. A. (1992). Gardeners and gurus: Patterns of cooperation among CAD users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 107–117). Monterey, CA: ACM New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142767.

  12. Karasti, H., & Baker, K. S. (2004). Infrastructuring for the long-term: ecological information management. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004 (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. (2014). The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14) (pp. 3543–3552). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111.

  14. Ludwig, T., Boden, A., & Pipek, V. (2017). 3D printers as sociable technologies: taking appropriation infrastructures to the internet of things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ludwig, T., Stickel, O., Boden, A., & Pipek, V. (2014). Towards sociable technologies: An empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing. In Proceedings of DIS14 Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 835–844). Vancouver, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598528.

  16. Mackay, W. E. (1990). Patterns of sharing customizable software. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 209–221). Los Angeles, CA: ACM New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99356.

  17. Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work and organization. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). Knowledge-creating company. Knowledge-Creating Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(04)00066-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neill, J., Castellani, S., Grasso, A., Roulland, F., & Tolmie, P. (2005). Representations can be good enough. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW) (pp. 267–286). Paris, France: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_14.

  20. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 10(5), 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pipek, V. (2005). From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage. University of Oulu. Retrieved from http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514276302/isbn9514276302.pdf.

  22. Pipek, V., & Kahler, H. (2006). Supporting collaborative tailoring. In End-User Development (pp. 315–345). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rajkumar, R., Lee, I. L. I., Sha, L. S. L., & Stankovic, J. (2010). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. In 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) (pp. 731–736). https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837461.

  24. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. Retrieved from http://est.sagepub.com/content/5/2/243.short%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/C2907815-3C48-4044-A729-DCFE2FCBE630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson, T., & Wagner, I. (2015). CSCW and the internet of things. In N. Boulus-Rødje, G. Ellingsen, T. Bratteteig, M. Aanestad, & P. Bjorn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW) (pp. 19–23). Oslo, Norway: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4.

  26. Salovaara, A., Höök, K., Cheverst, K., Twidale, M., Chalmers, M., & Sas, C. (2011). Appropriation and creative use: linking user studies and design. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1979482.1979585.

  27. Schmidt, K. (2002). The problem with “awareness”: Introductory remarks on “awareness in CSCW”. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021272909573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, K. (2014). The concept of “Practice”: What’s the point? In C. Rossitto, L. Ciolfi, D. Martin, & B. Conein (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP) (pp. 427–444). Nice, France: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. C. (2002). How to infrastructure. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media—Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 151–162). London, UK: SAGE Pub.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stevens, G., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Appropriation infrastructure: Supporting the design of usages. In B. De Ruyter, V. Pipek, M. B. Rosson, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on End-User Development (Vol. 5435/2009, pp. 50–69). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Stringer, M., Fitzpatrick, G., & Harris, E. (2006). Lessons for the future: Experiences with the installation and use of today’s domestic sensors and technologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (pp. 383–399). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wulf, V., Müller, C., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., & Stevens, G. (2015). Practice-based computing: empirically grounded conceptualizations derived from design case studies. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt, & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world (pp. 111–150). London: Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Thomas Ludwig, Peter Tolmie & Volkmar Pipek

Authors
  1. Thomas Ludwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Tolmie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volkmar Pipek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ludwig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Alessandro Soro

  2. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Margot Brereton

  3. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Paul Roe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ludwig, T., Tolmie, P., Pipek, V. (2019). From the Internet of Things to an Internet of Practices. In: Soro, A., Brereton, M., Roe, P. (eds) Social Internet of Things. Internet of Things. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94657-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94659-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics