Skip to main content

A Consistency-Preserving Editing Model for Dynamic Filtered Engineering of Model-Driven Product Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 880))

  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

The high cognitive complexity of model-driven software product line engineering is due to the fact that developers have to manually create, edit, and maintain multi-variant artifacts. As a solution, the adaptation of filtered editing has been proposed recently. Filtered editing can be applied in a static or in a dynamic way; in the latter case, new co-evolution problems occur when considering the evolving relationships between the historical, the variant, and the product dimension. This paper investigates, formally defines, and demonstrates by examples nine consistency constraints connected to dynamic filtered editing. Furthermore, we suggest a consistency-preserving editing model comprising four operations that synchronize a transparent multi-version repository with a single-version workspace view being presented to the user: check-out, modify, commit, and a novel operation, migrate, which prepares the workspace for the subsequent edit session. Several advantages of dynamic over static filtered or unfiltered editing are confirmed both on a theoretical and on an experimental basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this way, a “more complete” ambition is obtained, which represents, however, the same set of product versions as \(a^{cm}\). The options additionally included in \({}^{\mathcal {P}\mathcal {D}}a^{cm}\) may occur in visibilities \(v'\), therefore \(v'({}^{\mathcal {P}\mathcal {D}}a^{cm})\) will less likely return undefined.

  2. 2.

    In such a case, newly introduced feature model rules prevent the product version available in the workspace from being reproduced by future check-outs. The performed modifications are, however, valid for different versions included in the ambition.

References

  1. Völter, M., Stahl, T., Bettin, J., Haase, A., Helsen, S.: Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conradi, R., Westfechtel, B.: Version models for software configuration management. ACM Comput. Surv. 30, 232–282 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Berlin (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28901-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Carnegie-Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gomaa, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML: From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwägerl, F., Westfechtel, B.: Maintaining workspace consistency in filtered editing of dynamically evolving model-driven software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, MODELSWARD 2017, Porto, Portugal, 19–21 February 2017, pp. 15–28. SCITEPRESS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kästner, C., Trujillo, S., Apel, S.: Visualizing software product line variabilities in source code. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International SPLC Workshop on Visualisation in Software Product Line Engineering (ViSPLE), pp. 303–313 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walkingshaw, E., Ostermann, K.: Projectional editing of variational software. In: Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences, GPCE 2014, Vasteras, Sweden, 15–16 September 2014, pp. 29–38 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanciulescu, S., Berger, T., Walkingshaw, E., Wasowski, A.: Concepts, operations and feasibility of a projection-based variation control systems. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, ICSME 2016, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2–7 October 2016, pp. 323–333. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sarnak, N., Bernstein, R.L., Kruskal, V.: Creation and maintenance of multiple versions. In: Winkler, J.F.H. (ed.) Software Configuration Management. German Chapter of the ACM, vol. 30, pp. 264–275. Teubner (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwägerl, F., Buchmann, T., Uhrig, S., Westfechtel, B.: Towards the integration of model-driven engineering, software product line engineering, and software configuration management. In: Hammoudi, S., Pires, L.F., Desfray, P., Filipe, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, Angers, France, pp. 5–18. SCITEPRESS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Batory, D.: A standard problem for evaluating product-line methodologies. In: Bosch, J. (ed.) GCSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2186, pp. 10–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44800-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Westfechtel, B., Munch, B.P., Conradi, R.: A layered architecture for uniform version management. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27, 1111–1133 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwägerl, F., Buchmann, T., Westfechtel, B.: SuperMod - a model-driven tool that combines version control and software product line engineering. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Paradigm Trends, Colmar, Alsace, France, pp. 5–18. SCITEPRESS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwägerl, F., Buchmann, T., Westfechtel, B.: Filtered model-driven product line engineering with SuperMod: the home automation case. In: Lorenz, P., Cardoso, J., Maciaszek, L.A., van Sinderen, M. (eds.) ICSOFT 2015. CCIS, vol. 586, pp. 19–41. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30142-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Heidenreich, F., Kopcsek, J., Wende, C.: FeatureMapper: mapping features to models. In: Companion Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2008), pp. 943–944. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Schwägerl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schwägerl, F., Westfechtel, B. (2018). A Consistency-Preserving Editing Model for Dynamic Filtered Engineering of Model-Driven Product Lines. In: Pires, L., Hammoudi, S., Selic, B. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. MODELSWARD 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 880. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94764-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94764-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94763-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94764-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics