Skip to main content

The Positioning of Italian Universities in the International Rankings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1579 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10962))

Abstract

The evaluation of the universities appears to be of considerable interest both at national level, through the Agency for the Evaluation of the University and Research System (ANVUR), and at international level, through the International Rankings, produced by the various agencies. The rankings are an important communication tool that allows for comparing the universities according to combinations of suitably weighted parameters. The aim of this work is to deepen the methodological aspects of the rankings, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of these tools. In addition, we will focus on some of the international rankings, synthetically analyzing the indicators considered and the positioning of Italian universities in recent years.

The contribution is the result of joint reflections by the authors, with the following contributions attributed to M. Cazzolle (chapter 4), to P. Perchinunno (chapter 1 and 5), and to V. Ricci (chapters 2 and 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altbach, P.G.: The dilemmas of ranking. Int. High. Educ. 42, 2–3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altbach, P.G.: The globalization of college and university rankings. Change: Mag. High. Learn. 44(1), 26–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.636001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastedo, M.N., Bowman, N.A.: College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Res. High. Educ. 52(1), 3–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hazelkorn, E.: Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: institutional strategies and policy choices. High. Educ. Manag. Policy 21(1), 55–76 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hazelkorn, E.: Reflections on a decade of global rankings: what we’ve learned and outstanding issues. Eur. J. Educ. 49(1), 12–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huisman, J., Currie, J.: Accountability in higher education: bridge over troubled water? High. Educ. 48(4), 529–551 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marginson, S., van der Wende, M.: To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education. J. Stud. Int. Educ. 11(3/4), 306–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salmi, J., Saroyan, A.: League tables as policy instruments: uses and misuses. High. Educ. Manag. Policy 19(2), 31–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, R.: Methodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings. Aust. Univ. Rev. 50(2), 51–58 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Messick, S.: Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Keynote address presented at the Conference on Contemporary Psychological Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden, June 1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meredith, M.: Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. news & world report college rankings. Res. High. Educ. 45(5), 443–461 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fidler, B., Parsons, C.: World university ranking methodologies: stability and variability. High. Educ. Rev. 40(3), 15–34 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Federkeil, G.: Some aspects of ranking methodology. The CHE ranking of german universities. High. Educ. Eur. 27(4), 389–397 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Provan, D., Abercromby, K.: University league tables and rankings. A critical analysis. CHEMS - Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service, 30 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts, D., Thomson, L.: University league tables and the impact on student recruitment. Reputation Management for Universities, Working Paper Series No. 2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Perchinunno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cazzolle, M., Perchinunno, P., Ricci, V. (2018). The Positioning of Italian Universities in the International Rankings. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018. ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95167-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95168-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics