Skip to main content

Promoting Knowledge Sharing and Value Co-creation Between University and Learners: A Learning Model Based on Communities of Practice and Service-Dominant Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 877))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2881 Accesses

Abstract

Learning is a continuing social action that takes place through interactions between the lecturers and the community of students and knowledge sharing is an integral part of the learning process for a class in the university to engage in co-creating of learning values. Research and industry experience on knowledge sharing confirm the benefits of knowledge sharing for generating new ideas, team building & silo breaking, creating sense of purpose, and avoiding making the same mistakes several times, to name a few. Although it seems trivial that there are many benefits of knowledge sharing, in practice it is not easy to encourage students to do so because of the organizational, technical and cultural barriers. The literature shows tertiary students are not naturally willing to share knowledge voluntarily. Numerous studies have been carried to identify barriers to knowledge sharing, but there is a scarcity of research conducted to help students, working in a classroom setting, to overcome those barriers that are important for the co-creation of learning value. Forming communities of practice (CoPs) among students can contribute significantly to both knowledge sharing and learning. When students are able and willing to share knowledge, then an innovative learning environment can be created to encourage students to engage in value co-creation. This paper takes a closer look at service-dominant (S-D) logic frameworks and their application to students in the university, in order to facilitate co-creation of learning value. Drawing on the conceptual basis of CoPs and S-D logic, this paper proposes a learning model that may offer the opportunity for promoting knowledge sharing and co-creating of learning value between university and students working in a classroom setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (Seinäjoki UAS) is a multidisciplinary tertiary institution, research, development and innovation in West Finland.

References

  1. Smith, M.K.: Learning Theory. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education (2003). http://infed.org/mobi/learning-theory-models-product-and-process/

  2. Stats Canada: 61-Educational Services. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Canada 2017. The Government of Canada (2016). http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/

  3. Bok, D.: Higher Learning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schon, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44(1), 5–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 1–10 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalcraft, D., Lynch, J.: Value propositions in higher education – an S-D logic view. In: Patterson, A., Oakes, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Conference: Marketing Fields Forever. Academy of Marketing, Liverpool (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, F.M.: Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer. Qual. Assur. Educ. 3(3), 10–21 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mark, E.: Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 35(1), 2–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schon, D.A.: Educating The Reflective Practitioner. American Educational Research Association, Washington (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Etgar, M.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2002). (Pine, J.B.I.I., Gilmore, J.: Welcome to the experience economy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76(4), 97–105 (1998))

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., Yuldashev, F., Demiroz, F.: Social network analysis (SNA). applications in evaluating MPA classes. J. Public Aff. Educ. 16(4), 541–563 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., de Laat, M.: Promoting and Assessing Value Creation in Communities and Network. Open University, The Netherlands. Ruud de Moor Centrum. Rapport 18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sie, A.B., Aho, A.-M., Uden, L.: CoP for knowledge sharing in higher education: analysing CoP through the lens of activity theory. In: 3rd International Conference on LTEC, Santiago (2014). ISBN 1865-0929

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalkir, K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Praxis, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fahimeh, B., Kermani, Z.J.: Knowledge sharing behaviour influences: a case of library and information science faculties in Iran. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 16(1), 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keyes, J.: Identifying the Barriers to Knowledge sharing in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations (2008). http://www.newarttech.com/KnowledgeSharing.pdf

  19. Riege, A.: Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. J. Knowl. Manag. 9(3), 8–35 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, P.Y., Scott, J.L.: An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer. J. Knowl. Manag. 9(2), 75–90 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eid, M., Nuhu, N.A.: The impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge sharing on Saudi students. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 9, 48–57 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaheen, M., Ting, J.Y.: Information and knowledge sharing by undergraduate students in Singapore. In: Khosrow-Pour, M. (ed.) Emerging Trends and Challenges in Information Technology Management, vols. 1 and 2. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic 2025. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34(1), 46–67 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gummesson, E.: Relationship Marketing: Its Role in the Service Economy, Understanding Service Management. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie, K., Wu, Y., Xiao, J., Hu, Q.: Value co-creation between firms and customers: the role of big data-based cooperative assets. Inf. Manag. 53, 1043–1048 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mass customization concept to engage in value co-creation with customers. www.mass-customization.de

  27. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Yunus, N., Sabtu, N.I., Hamid, M.H.: Social customer relationship management and student empowerment in online learning systems. Int. J. Electron. Customer Relat. Manag. 9(2–3), 104–121 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong, A.: The relationship between institution branding, teaching quality and student satisfaction in higher education in Hong Kong. J. Mark. Hum. Resour. 4(1), 169–188 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chalcraft, D., Hilton, T., Hughes, T.: Customer, collaborator or co-creator? What is the role of the student in a changing higher education servicescape? J. Mark. High. Educ. 25(1), 1–4 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L.: Extending the context of service: from encounters to ecosystems. J. Serv. Mark. 29(6/7), 453–462 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Berthon, P., John, J.: From entities to interfaces: delineating value in customer-firm interactions. In: Lusch, R., Vargo, S. (eds.) The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, pp. 196–207. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Maria, T., Garifallos, F., Dimitros, P., Konstantinos, T.: Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 1(2), pp. 160–171 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.M.: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Moore, B.: Using technology to promote communities of practice (CoP) in social work education. Soc. Work Educ. 27(6), 592–600 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Hwie Sie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sie, B.H., Wang, W. (2018). Promoting Knowledge Sharing and Value Co-creation Between University and Learners: A Learning Model Based on Communities of Practice and Service-Dominant Logic. In: Uden, L., Hadzima, B., Ting, IH. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95203-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95204-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics