Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Dynamic Data-Driven Optimization Framework for Demand Side Management in Microgrids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems

Abstract

The efficient utilization of distributed generation resources (DGs) and demand side management (DSM) in large-scale power systems play a crucial role in satisfying and controlling electricity demand through an economically viable and environmentally friendly way. However, uncertainties in power generation from DGs, variations in load demand, and conflicts in objectives (emission, cost, etc.) pose major challenges to determine the optimal operation planning of microgrids. In this chapter, we propose a dynamic data-driven multi-objective optimization model for a day-ahead operation planning for microgrids, integrating interruption load management (ILM) as a DSM program, while collectively considering the total cost and emissions as objective functions. The proposed model includes three modules that interact with each other: (1) a simulation module that captures the behavior of operating components such as solar panels, wind turbines, etc. and provides the data for the optimization model; (2) an optimization module that determines the optimal operational plan, which includes utilization of diesel generators, purchased electricity from utility and interrupted load, considering cost and emissions objective functions using 𝜖-constraint method; and (3) a rule-based real-time decision making module that adapts the operation plan from the optimization model based on dynamic data from the microgrid and sends the revised plan back to the microgrid. The capabilities and performance of the proposed dynamic data-driven optimization framework are demonstrated through a case study of a typical electrical power system. The resultant operation plan is quite promising regarding total cost and CO2 emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Abido, Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for environmental/economic dispatch problem. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 79(7), 1105–1113 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Atwa, E. El-Saadany, M. Salama, R. Seethapathy, Optimal renewable resources mix for distribution system energy loss minimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(1), 360–370 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Blasch, Y. Al-Nashif, S. Hariri, Static versus dynamic data information fusion analysis using dddas for cyber security trust. Proc. Comput. Sci. 29, 1299–1313 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Celik, S. Lee, K. Vasudevan, Y.J. Son, DDDAS-based multi-fidelity simulation framework for supply chain systems. IIE Trans. 42(5), 325–341 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Darema, Dynamic data driven application systems, in Process coordination and ubiquitous computing, ed. by D. C. Marinescu, C. Lee (Eds), (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2002), p. 149

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Darema, Dynamic data driven applications systems: a new paradigm for application simulations and measurements, in International Conference on Computational Science (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 662–669

    Google Scholar 

  7. FAWN, Ftp: Yearly csv data (2014). http://agrofawn-prod01.osg.ufl.edu/fawnpub/data/hourly_summaries

  8. R. Fourer, D.M. Gay, B. Kernighan, AMPL, vol. 117 (Boyd & Fraser, Danvers, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Fujimoto, R. Guensler, M. Hunter, H.K. Kim, J. Lee, J. Leonard II, M. Palekar, K. Schwan, B. Seshasayee, Dynamic data driven application simulation of surface transportation systems, in International Conference on Computational Science (Springer, Berlin/New York, 2006), pp. 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.M. Fujimoto, N. Celik, H. Damgacioglu, M. Hunter, D. Jin, Y.J. Son, J. Xu, Dynamic data driven application systems for smart cities and urban infrastructures, in Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, 2016), pp. 1143–1157

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.E. Kass, A.E. Raftery, Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90(430), 773–795 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Katiraei, M.R. Iravani, Power management strategies for a microgrid with multiple distributed generation units. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21(4), 1821–1831 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.M. Khaleghi, D. Xu, Z. Wang, M. Li, A. Lobos, J. Liu, Y.J. Son, A DDDAMS-based planning and control framework for surveillance and crowd control via UAVs and UGVs. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(18), 7168–7183 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H.L. Li, C.T. Chang, J.F. Tsai, Approximately global optimization for assortment problems using piecewise linearization techniques. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(3), 584–589 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Mavrotas, Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 213(2), 455–465 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. A.H. Mohsenian-Rad, V.W. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, A. Leon-Garcia, Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(3), 320–331 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Grid, Hourly electric supply charges (2015). https://www.nationalgridus.com/niagaramohawk/business/rates/5_hour_charge.asp

  18. D.S. Parker, Research highlights from a large scale residential monitoring study in a hot climate. Energy Build. 35(9), 863–876 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A.E. Raftery, Choosing models for cross-classifications. Am. Soc. Rev. 51(1), 145–146 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Setämaa-Kärkkäinen, K. Miettinen, J. Vuori, Best compromise solution for a new multiobjective scheduling problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 33(8), 2353–2368 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Shi, H. Damgacioglu, N. Celik, A dynamic data-driven approach for operation planning of microgrids. Proc. Comput. Sci. 51, 2543–2552 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A.E. Thanos, X. Shi, J.P. Sáenz, N. Celik, A DDDAMS framework for real-time load dispatching in power networks, in Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World (IEEE Press, Piscataway, 2013), pp. 1893–1904

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.E. Thanos, D.E. Moore, X. Shi, N. Celik, System of systems modeling and simulation for microgrids using DDDAMS, in Modeling and simulation support for system of systems engineering applications, ed. by L. B. Rainey, A. Tolk (Eds), (Wiley, Hoboken, 2015), p. 337

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.E. Thanos, M. Bastani, N. Celik, C.H. Chen, Dynamic data driven adaptive simulation framework for automated control in microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(1), 209–218 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Wu, H. Mohsenian-Rad, J. Huang, A.Y. Wang, Demand side management for wind power integration in microgrid using dynamic potential game theory, in 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps) (IEEE, Piscataway, 2011), pp. 1199–1204

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. D.C. Yu, T.C. Nguyen, P. Haddawy (1999) Bayesian network model for reliability assessment of power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14(2), 426–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award FA9550-18-1-0075, and National Science Foundation under award number ECCS-1462409.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

    Haluk Damgacioglu & Nurcin Celik

  2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Mehrad Bastani

Authors
  1. Haluk Damgacioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehrad Bastani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nurcin Celik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurcin Celik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Research Laboratory, Arlington, VA, USA

    Erik Blasch

  2. Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Sai Ravela

  3. Information Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, NY, USA

    Alex Aved

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Damgacioglu, H., Bastani, M., Celik, N. (2018). A Dynamic Data-Driven Optimization Framework for Demand Side Management in Microgrids. In: Blasch, E., Ravela, S., Aved, A. (eds) Handbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95504-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95504-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95503-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95504-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation