Skip to main content

Towards Exact State Complexity Bounds for Input-Driven Pushdown Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Developments in Language Theory (DLT 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11088))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper improves several state complexity bounds for input-driven pushdown automata (IDPDA), also known as visibly pushdown automata. For deterministic IDPDA it is proved that the number of states sufficient and in the worst case necessary to represent the reversal of an n-state automaton is exactly \(n^n\) if all inputs are assumed to be well-nested, and between \(n^n\) and \(n(n^n - (n-1)^n) + 1\) without this restriction, cf. \(2^{\varTheta (n \log n)}\) in the literature. For the concatenation of an m-state and an n-state IDPDA, the new lower bound is \(mn^n\), which is asymptotically tight for well-nested inputs. Without this restriction, the state complexity is between \(mn^n\) and \(m(n+1)n^n2^n\). Finally, it is proved that transforming an n-state nondeterministic IDPDA to a deterministic one requires exactly \(2^{n^2}\) states, cf. \(2^{\varTheta (n^2)}\) in the literature; the known lower bounds on complementing nondeterministic IDPDA and on transforming them to unambiguous are also improved.

G. Jirásková—Research supported by VEGA grant 2/0084/15 and grant APVV-15-0091.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alur, R., Madhusudan, P.: Visibly pushdown languages. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. STOC 2004, Chicago, USA, 13–16 June 2004, pp. 202–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1007352.1007390

  2. von Braunmühl, B., Verbeek, R.: Input driven languages are recognized in log n space. Ann. Discrete Math. 24, 1–20 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73072-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kutrib, M., Malcher, A., Wendlandt, M.: Tinput-driven pushdown automata. In: Durand-Lose, J., Nagy, B. (eds.) MCU 2015. LNCS, vol. 9288, pp. 94–112. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23111-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung, H.: Separating exponentially ambiguous finite automata from polynomially ambiguous finite automata. SIAM J. Comput. 27(4), 1073–1082 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehlhorn, K.: Pebbling mountain ranges and its application to DCFL-recognition. In: de Bakker, J., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 1980. LNCS, vol. 85, pp. 422–435. Springer, Heidelberg (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10003-2_89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Complexity of input-driven pushdown automata. SIGACT News 45(2), 47–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2636805.2636821

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Descriptional complexity of unambiguous input-driven pushdown automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 566, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.11.015

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: State complexity of operations on input-driven pushdown automata. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 86, 207–228 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2017.02.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Edit distance neighbourhoods of input-driven pushdown automata. In: Weil, P. (ed.) CSR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10304, pp. 260–272. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58747-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: The quotient operation on input-driven pushdown automata. In: Pighizzini, G., Câmpeanu, C. (eds.) DCFS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10316, pp. 299–310. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60252-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Further closure properties of input-driven pushdown automata. In: Konstantinidis, S., Pighizzini, G. (eds.) DCFS 2018, pp. 224–236. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94631-3_19. to appear

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Piao, X., Salomaa, K.: Operational state complexity of nested word automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410, 3290–3302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.05.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Salomaa, K.: Limitations of lower bound methods for deterministic nested word automata. Inf. Comput. 209, 580–589 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2010.11.021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Galina Jirásková .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jirásková, G., Okhotin, A. (2018). Towards Exact State Complexity Bounds for Input-Driven Pushdown Automata. In: Hoshi, M., Seki, S. (eds) Developments in Language Theory. DLT 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11088. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98654-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98654-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98653-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98654-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics