Abstract
To evaluate a system that automatically summarizes video files (image and audio), it should be taken into account how the system works and which are the part of the process that should be evaluated, as two main topics to be evaluated can be differentiated: the video summary and the text summary. So, in the present article it is presented a complete way in order to evaluate this type of systems efficiently. With this objective, the authors have performed two types of evaluation: objective and subjective (the main focus of this paper). The objective evaluation is mainly done automatically, using established and proven metrics or frameworks, but it may need in some way the participation of humans, while the subjective evaluation is based directly on the opinion of people, who evaluate the system by answering a set of questions, which are then processed in order to obtain the targeted conclusions. The obtained general results from both evaluation systems will provide valuable information about the completeness and coherence, as well as the correctness of the generated summarizations from different points of view, as the lexical, semantical, etc. perspective. Apart from providing information about the state of the art, it will be presented an experimental proposal too, including the parameters of the experiment and the evaluation methods to be applied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Truong, B.T., Venkatesh, S.: Video Abstraction: A Systematic Review and Classification (2007)
Fontes de Avila, S.E., Brandão Lopes, A., da Luz Jr, A., de Alburquerque Araújo, A.: VSUMM: a mechanism designed to produce static video summaries and a novel evaluation method (2010)
Cayllahua Cahuina, E.J., Camara Chavez, G.: A New Method for Static Video Summarization Using Local Descriptors and Video Temporal Segmentation (2013)
Dumont, E., Bernard, M.: Automatic Evaluation Method for Rushes Summary Content (2009)
Money, A.G., Agius, H.: Video Summarisation: A Conceptual Framework and Survey of the State of the Art (2008)
Kannappan, S., Liu, Y., Tiddeman, B.: A Pertinent Evaluation of Automatic Video Summary (2016)
Li, Y., Merialdo, B.: Multi-video Summarization Based on Video-MMR (2010)
Li, Y., Merialdo, B.: VERT: Automatic Evaluation of Video Summaries (2010)
Mohamed, K.M., Ismail, M.A., Ghanem, N.M.: VSCAN: An Enhanced Video Summarization using Density-based Spatial Clustering (2014)
Molina, A., Torres-Moreno, J.-M.: The Turing Test for Automatic Text Summarization Evaluation (2016)
Molina Villegas, A., Torres-Moreno, J.-M., Sanjuan, E.: A Turing Test to Evaluate a Complex Summarization Task (2013)
Lin, C.-Y., Hovy, E.: Manual and Automatic Evaluation of Summaries (2002)
Hassel, M.: Evaluation of Automatic Text Summarization: a practical implementation (2004)
Saziyabegum, S., Sajja, P.S.: Review on Text Summarization Evaluation Method (2017)
Acknowledgements
Research work funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Competitiveness and Industry (Spain) conferred under the Chist-Era AMIS project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garcia-Zapirain, B. et al. (2019). A Proposed Methodology for Subjective Evaluation of Video and Text Summarization. In: Choroś, K., Kopel, M., Kukla, E., Siemiński, A. (eds) Multimedia and Network Information Systems. MISSI 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 833. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98678-4_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98678-4_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98677-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98678-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)