Skip to main content

Implicit Representation of Bigranular Rules for Multigranular Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11029))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1006 Accesses

Abstract

Domains for spatial and temporal data are often multigranular in nature, possessing a natural order structure defined by spatial inclusion and time-interval inclusion, respectively. This order structure induces lattice-like (partial) operations, such as join, which in turn lead to join rules, in which a single domain element (granule) is asserted to be equal to, or contained in, the join of a set of such granules. In general, the efficient representation of such join rules is a difficult problem. However, there is a very effective representation in the case that the rule is bigranular; i.e., all of the joined elements belong to the same granularity, and, in addition, complete information about the (non)disjointness of all granules involved is known. The details of that representation form the focus of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    is the granule preorder defined in the granule assignment (see Summary 2.3) while is the general subsumption relation used to define rules. For , it is always the case that implies . The converse is not required to hold, although in practice it usually does.

References

  1. Bettini, C., Dyreson, C.E., Evans, W.S., Snodgrass, R.T., Wang, X.S.: A glossary of time granularity concepts. In: Etzion, O., Jajodia, S., Sripada, S. (eds.) Temporal Databases: Research and Practice. LNCS, vol. 1399, pp. 406–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053711

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Camossi, E., Bertolotto, M., Bertino, E.: A multigranular object-oriented framework supporting spatio-temporal granularity conversions. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20(5), 511–534 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davey, B.A., Priestly, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Egenhofer, M.J.: Deriving the composition of binary topological relations. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 5(2), 133–149 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Euzenat, J., Montanari, A.: Time granularity. In: Fisher, M., Gabbay, D.M., Vila, L. (eds.) Handbook of Temporal Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 59–118. Elsevier, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagin, R.: Horn clauses and database dependencies. J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 29(4), 952–985 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hegner, S.J., Rodríguez, M.A.: Integration integrity for multigranular data. In: Pokorný, J., Ivanović, M., Thalheim, B., Šaloun, P. (eds.) ADBIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9809, pp. 226–242. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44039-2_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hegner, S.J., Rodríguez, M.A.: A model for multigranular data and its integrity. Informatica Lith. Acad. Sci. 28, 45–78 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kifer, M., Bernstein, A., Lewis, P.M.: Database Systems: An Application-Oriented Approach, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mach, M.A., Owoc, M.L.: Knowledge granularity and representation of knowledge: towards knowledge grid. In: Shi, Z., Vadera, S., Aamodt, A., Leake, D. (eds.) IIP 2010. IAICT, vol. 340, pp. 251–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16327-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Monk, J.D.: Mathematical Logic. Springer, New York (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9452-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, S., Liu, D.: Spatio-temporal database with multi-granularities. In: Li, Q., Wang, G., Feng, L. (eds.) WAIM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3129, pp. 137–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27772-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work of M. Andrea Rodríguez, as well as three visits of Stephen J. Hegner to Concepción, during which many of the ideas reported here were developed, were funded in part by Fondecyt-Conicyt grant number 1170497.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Hegner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hegner, S.J., Rodríguez, M.A. (2018). Implicit Representation of Bigranular Rules for Multigranular Data. In: Hartmann, S., Ma, H., Hameurlain, A., Pernul, G., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98809-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98809-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98808-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98809-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics