Skip to main content

A Compound Model for Consumer Health Search

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (CLEF 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11018))

Abstract

General search engines are still far from being effective in addressing complex consumer health queries. The language gap between the consumers and the medical resources can confuse non-expert consumers, and may cause problems like the growing concerns about common symptoms. Current methods in addressing this issue are primarily based on modern information retrieval approaches and query expansion is one of the primes. In this paper, an investigation on merging new schemes into state of the art techniques is made and a new compound system based on query expansion approach is presented. This system takes into account the characteristics of medical language and combines Natural Language Processing techniques with traditional query expansion to overcome the query expansion approach shortcomings of not paying enough attention to the specialty of the medical language. The system is evaluated on the CLEF 2017 eHealth IR challenge data and its effectiveness is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ctakes.apache.org/index.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/tools/openftlist/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskDocs/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.lemurproject.org/clueweb12.php/.

  5. 5.

    http://terrier.org/.

  6. 6.

    Since understandability assessments are calculated based on topical relevance, experiments 1, 2 and 3 with high topical relevance scores were selectively evaluated in understandability assessment.

References

  1. Budaher, J., Almasri, M., Goeuriot, L.: Comparison of several word embedding sources for medical information retrieval. In: CLEF (Working Notes), pp. 43–46 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Health online 2013. In: Health 2013, pp. 1–55 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hollada, J.L., et al.: Readability assessment of patient-centered outcomes research institute public abstracts in relation to accessibility. Epidemiology 28(4), e37–e38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopes, C.T., Ribeiro, C.: Effects of language and terminology on the usage of health query suggestions. In: Fuhr, N., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2016. LNCS, vol. 9822, pp. 83–95. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44564-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Mikolov, T., et al.: Effcient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  6. Oh, H.S., Jung, Y.: KISTI at CLEF eHealth 2016 task 3: ranking medical documents using word vectors. In: CLEF (Working Notes), pp. 103–108 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palotti, J.R., et al.: CLEF eHealth evaluation lab 2015, task 2: retrieving information about medical symptoms. In: CLEF (Working Notes) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Palotti, J., et al.: CLEF 2017 task overview: the IR task at the ehealth evaluation lab. In: Working Notes of Conference and Labs of the Evaluation (CLEF) Forum, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sinha, M., Mannarswamy, S., Roy, S.: CHIS@ FIRE: overview of the shared task on consumer health information search. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp. 193–196 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, H., Goncalves, T.: Promoting understandability in consumer health information search. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10193, pp. 727–734. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Zuccon, G.: Understandability biased evaluation for information retrieval. In: Ferro, N., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9626, pp. 280–292. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by EACEA under the Erasmus Mundus Action 2, Strand 1 project LEADER - Links in Europe and Asia for engineering, eDucation, Enterprise and Research exchanges.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hua Yang or Teresa Gonçalves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yang, H., Gonçalves, T. (2018). A Compound Model for Consumer Health Search. In: Bellot, P., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98931-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98932-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics