Abstract
The ethical and social implications of autonomous systems are forcing safety engineers and ethicists alike to confront new questions. This paper focuses on just one of these questions - moral responsibility - bringing together inter-disciplinary insights to an issue of growing public and regulatory concern. The central thesis is that, on a conception of moral responsibility that presupposes control, the increasing autonomy of systems prima facie diminishes the extent to which engineers and users can be considered morally responsible for system behaviour. This challenge to our normal attributions of moral responsibility as a result of autonomy has come to be known as the ‘responsibility gap’. We provide a characterisation of the moral responsibility gap, which we argue has two dimensions: causal and epistemic. At the end of the paper we highlight considerations for future work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lucas, J.R.: Responsibility (1993)
Talbert, M.: Moral Responsibility. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2015)
Aristotle: The Nichomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Strawson, P.F.: Freedom and resentment. In: Watson, G., (ed) Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 48, pp. 1–25. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)
Eshleman, A.: Moral responsibility (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-responsibility/ Accessed 20 June 2018
Fischer, J.M., Ravizza, M.: Responsibility and control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2000)
Hyman, J.: Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
Brink, D.O., Nelkin, D.: Fairness and the architecture of responsibility. Oxford Stud. Agency Responsib. 1, 284–313 (2013)
Matthias, A.: The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(3), 175–183 (2004)
Noorman, M.: Computing and moral responsibility (2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/computing-responsibility/ Accessed 08 Mar 2018
Jonas, H.: The imperative of responsibility. Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Porter, Z., Habli, I., Monkhouse, H., Bragg, J. (2018). The Moral Responsibility Gap and the Increasing Autonomy of Systems. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11094. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99228-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99229-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)