Skip to main content

First-Hitting Times for Finite State Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XV (PPSN 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11102))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of a randomized algorithm is bounding its expected run time on various problems. Formally speaking, this means bounding the expected first-hitting time of a random process. The two arguably most popular tools to do so are the fitness level method and drift theory. The fitness level method considers arbitrary transition probabilities but only allows the process to move toward the goal. On the other hand, drift theory allows the process to move into any direction as long as it move closer to the goal in expectation; however, this tendency has to be monotone and, thus, the transition probabilities cannot be arbitrary.

We provide a result that combines the benefit of these two approaches: our result gives a lower and an upper bound for the expected first-hitting time of a random process over \(\{0, \ldots , n\}\) that is allowed to move forward and backward by 1 and can use arbitrary transition probabilities. In case that the transition probabilities are known, our bounds coincide and yield the exact value of the expected first-hitting time. Further, we also state the stationary distribution as well as the mixing time of a special case of our scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The theorem itself assumes the search space to be bounded. However, the actual size of the search space does not matter for the expected first-hitting time.

References

  1. Dang, D.C., Lehre, P.K.: Runtime analysis of non-elitist populations: from classical optimisation to partial information. Algorithmica 75(3), 428–461 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Droste, S., Jansen, T., Wegener, I.: Dynamic parameter control in simple evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the FOGA 2000, pp. 275–294 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. He, J., Yao, X.: Drift analysis and average time complexity of evolutionary algorithms. Artif. Intell. 127(1), 57–85 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. He, J., Yao, X.: Erratum to: drift analysis and average time complexity of evolutionary algorithms. Artif. Intell. 140(1), 245–248 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He, J., Yao, X.: A study of drift analysis for estimating computation time of evolutionary algorithms. Nat. Comput. 3(1), 21–35 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jansen, T., Zarges, C.: Evolutionary algorithms and artificial immune systems on a bi-stable dynamic optimisation problem. In: Proceedings of the GECCO 2014, pp. 975–982 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johannsen, D.: Random combinatorial structures and randomized search heuristics. Ph.D. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes (2010). http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2011/3529/pdf/Dissertation3166JohaDani2010.pdf

  8. Kötzing, T., Lissovoi, A., Witt, C.: (1 + 1) EA on generalized dynamic OneMax. In: Proceedings of the FOGA XIII, pp. 40–51 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lengler, J.: Drift analysis. CoRR abs/1712.00964 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00964

  10. Levin, D.A., Peres, Y., Wilmer, E.L.: Markov Chains and Mixing Times. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lissovoi, A., Witt, C.: MMAS versus population-based EA on a family of dynamic fitness functions. Algorithmica 75(3), 554–576 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitavskiy, B., Rowe, J.E., Cannings, C.: Theoretical analysis of local search strategies to optimize network communication subject to preserving the total number of links. Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern. 2(2), 243–284 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wegener, I.: Theoretical aspects of evolutionary algorithms. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Witt, C.: Fitness levels with tail bounds for the analysis of randomized search heuristics. Inf. Process. Lett. 114(1–2), 38–41 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin S. Krejca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kötzing, T., Krejca, M.S. (2018). First-Hitting Times for Finite State Spaces. In: Auger, A., Fonseca, C., Lourenço, N., Machado, P., Paquete, L., Whitley, D. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XV. PPSN 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99258-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99259-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics