Skip to main content

A General Framework and Metrics for Longitudinal Data Anonymization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Privacy in Statistical Databases (PSD 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11126))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 866 Accesses

Abstract

The bulk of methods in statistical disclosure control primarily deal with individual data from a cross-sectional perspective, i.e. data where individuals are observed at one single point in time. However, nowadays longitudinal data, i.e. individuals observed over multiple periods, are increasingly collected. Such data enhance undoubtedly the possibility of statistical analysis compared to cross-sectional data, but also come with some additional layers of information that have to remain practically useful in a privacy-preserving way. Building on the recently proposed permutation paradigm as an overarching approach to data anonymization, this paper establishes a general framework for the formulation of longitudinal data anonymization and proposes some universal metrics for the assessment of disclosure risk and information loss. We illustrate the application of these new tools using an empirical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this last case, it can also be ranked using semantic distance metrics (see above).

  2. 2.

    In that case \( P_{T,j} \) will be the identity matrix.

  3. 3.

    To avoid some unnecessary technical difficulties, in what follows zero values in these vectors will be assigned, without loss of generality, a infinitesimally small value ε > 0.

  4. 4.

    To avoid confusion, it must be noted that despite similar profiles Fig. 1 and Figs. 2 and 3 cannot directly be compared. In particular, the individuals with no time rank change in Fig. 1 are not necessarily the same than in Figs. 2 and 3: in the latter, individuals contributing to the flat portion of the curves at zero may have moved through time, but anonymization in t and t + 1 in fact didn’t alter their moves.

References

  1. Brand, R., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J.M.: Reference data sets to test and compare SDC methods for the protection of numerical microdata. Deliverable of the EU IST-2000-25069 “CASC” Project (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Muralidhar, K.: New directions in anonymization: permutation paradigm, verifiability by subjects and intruders, transparency to users. Inf. Sci. 337, 11–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Sánchez, D., Rufian-Torrell, G.: Anonymization of nominal data based on semantic marginality. Inf. Sci. 242, 35–48 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fung, B.C.M., Wang, K., Chen, R., Yu, P.S.: Privacy-preserving data publishing: a survey of recent developments. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 42, 1–53 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hundepool, A., et al.: Statistical Disclosure Control. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Muralidhar, K., Sarathy, R., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Reverse mapping to preserve the marginal distributions of attributes in masked microdata. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. (ed.) PSD 2014. LNCS, vol. 8744, pp. 105–116. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11257-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz, N.: A general cipher for individual data anonymization, under review for Information Sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.02557 (2018)

  8. Sehatkar, M., Matwin, S.: HALT: hybrid anonymization of longitudinal transactions. In: Eleventh Conference on Privacy, Security, Trust (PST), pp. 127–134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss, R.E.: Modelling Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28314-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Ruiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ruiz, N. (2018). A General Framework and Metrics for Longitudinal Data Anonymization. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Montes, F. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99771-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99771-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99770-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99771-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics