Skip to main content

New Methods of Results Merging for Distributed Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
Distributed Multimedia Information Retrieval (DIR 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2924))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In distributed information retrieval systems, document overlaps occur frequently across results from different resources. This is especially the case for meta-search engines which merge results from several web search engines. This paper addresses the problem of merging results exploiting overlaps in order to achieve better performance. New algorithms for merging results are proposed, which take advantage of the use of duplicate documents in two ways: one correlates scores from different results; the other regards duplicates as increasing evidence of being relevant to the given query. An extensive experimentation has demonstrated that these methods are effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowerman, B.L., O’Connell, R.T.: Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach. PWS-KENT Publishing Company (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callan, J.K., Lu, Z., Croft, W.: Searching distributed collections with inference networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Seattle, USA, July 1995, pp. 21–28 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calve, A.L., Savoy, J.: Database merging strategy based on logistic regression. Information Processing and Management 36(3), 341–359 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Craswell, N., Bailer, P., Hawking, D.: Server selection on the world wide web. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, San Antonio, CA, USA, June 2000, pp. 37–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dreilinger, D., Howe, A.: Experiences with selectiong search engines using metasearch. ACM Transaction on Information Systems 15(3), 195–222 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, E.A., Shaw, J.: Combination of multiple searchs. In: The Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2), Gaitherburg, MD, USA (August 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gauch, S., Wang, G., Gomez, M.: Profusion: Intelligent fusion from multiple, distributed search engines. Journal of Universal Computer Science 2(9), 637–649 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howe, A., Dreilinger, D.: Savvysearch: A meta-search engine that learns which search engines to query. AI Magazine 18(2), 19–25 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inquirus, http://www.inquirus.com/

  10. Lee, J.H.: Analysis of multiple evidence combination. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, July 1997, pp. 267–275 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mearf, http://mearf.cs.umn.edu/

  12. Meng, W., Yu, C., Liu, K.: Building efficient and effective metasearch engines. ACM Computing Surveys 34(1), 48–89 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metacrawler, http://www.metacrawler.com/

  14. Ogilvie, P., Callan, J.: Experiments using the lemur toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Text REtrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, November 2001, pp. 103–108 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oztekin, B., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: Expert agreement and content baed reranking in a meta search environment using mearf. In: Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, May 2002, pp. 333–344 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Profusion, http://www.profusion.com/

  17. Selberg, E., Etzioni, O.: Multi-service search and comparison using the metacrawler. In: Proceedings of the 4th International World Wide Web Conference, Paris, France (May 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selberg, E., Etzioni, O.: The metacrawler architecture for resource aggregion on the web. IEEE Expert 12(1), 8–14 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Si, L., Callan, J.: Using sampled data and regression to merge search enging results. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Tempere, Finland, August 2002, pp. 19–26 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Voorhees, E.M., Gupta, N.K., Johnson-Laird, B.: Learning collection fusion strategies. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 1995, pp. 172–179 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vort, C.C., Cottrell, G.A.: A fusion via a linear combination of scores. Information Retrieval 1(3), 151–173 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, S., Gibb, F., Crestani, F.: Experiments with document archive size detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Retrieval Research, Pisa, Italy, April 2003, pp. 294–304 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, C., Meng, G., Liu, K., Wu, W., Rishe, N.: Efficient and effective metasearch for a large number of text databases. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Kansas City, USA, November 2001, pp. 217–224 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, S., Crestani, F., Gibb, F. (2004). New Methods of Results Merging for Distributed Information Retrieval. In: Callan, J., Crestani, F., Sanderson, M. (eds) Distributed Multimedia Information Retrieval. DIR 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2924. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24610-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24610-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20875-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24610-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics