Skip to main content

Constituent Elements of a Correctness-Preserving UML Design Approach

  • Conference paper
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2999))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 407 Accesses

Abstract

The correctness of design decisions is a very relevant aspect of building any software or hardware system. Emerging techniques tend to include formal methods in the system design flow. Together with older, established techniques, already well known to the present day designer, the combined approach should bring benefits in the form of correctness of the design, increase of reliability, etc, all these leading to a similar increase in productivity. In this study, we present a method of such combined design, by mixing a formal method strategies and rules, with UML, a relatively new but popular design method. Our formal framework is represented by the Action Systems formalism. We show how the UML models can be correctly changed by incorporating precise derivation rules expressed in OCL. The initial, abstract models can be thus transformed into more concrete models, without violating the intended specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Back, R.J.R., Kurki-Suonio, R.: Distributed Cooperation with Action Systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 10(4), 513–554 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Back, R.J.R., von Wright, J.: Trace refinement of action systems. In: CONCUR-1994, August 1994, Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Back, R.J.R., von Wright, J.: Refinement Calculus: A Systematic Introduction. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton, C., Davies, J.: Using Relational and Behavioral Semantics in the Verification of Object Models. In: Talcott, C., Smith, S. (eds.) Proceedings of FMOODS 2000, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooke, P.J., Paige, R.F.: The Design of a Tool-Supported Graphical Notation for Timed CSP. In: Butler, M., Petre, L., Sere, K. (eds.) IFM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2335, pp. 299–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Brucker, A.D., Wolff, B.: HOL-OCL: Experiences, Consequences and Design Choices. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, p. 196. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammad, A., Tatibouët, B., Voisinet, J.-C., Wu, W.: From a B Specification to UML StateChart Diagrams. In: George, C.W., Miao, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2495, pp. 511–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Richters, M., Gogola, M.: OCL: Syntax, Semantics and Tools. In: Clark, A., Warmer, J. (eds.) Object Modeling with the OCL. LNCS, vol. 2263, pp. 42–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Seceleanu, T., Westerlund, T.: Aspects of Formal and Graphical Design of a Bus System. In: To appear in Proceedings of the Design Automation and Test in Europe Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sekerinski, E., Zurob, R.: Translating Statecharts to B. In: Butler, M., Petre, L., Sere, K. (eds.) IFM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2335, pp. 128–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Souza, D.F., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components and Frameworks with UML -The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sunyé, G., Pollet, D., Le Traon, Y., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Refactoring UML Models. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Westerlund, T., Seceleanu, T.: UML Profile for Action Systems. TUCS technical report Nr 581 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Object Management Group. Object Constraint Language Specification. Version 1.3 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language Specification

    Google Scholar 

  17. DSTC, IBM. MOF Query / Views / Transformations. Initial submission (March 2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seceleanu, T., Plosila, J. (2004). Constituent Elements of a Correctness-Preserving UML Design Approach. In: Boiten, E.A., Derrick, J., Smith, G. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24756-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24756-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21377-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24756-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics