Skip to main content

Cooperation between Branch and Bound and Evolutionary Approaches to Solve a Bi-objective Flow Shop Problem

  • Conference paper
Experimental and Efficient Algorithms (WEA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3059))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Over the years, many techniques have been established to solve NP-Hard Optimization Problems and in particular multiobjective problems. Each of them are efficient on several types of problems or instances. We can distinguish exact methods dedicated to solve small instances, from heuristics – and particularly metaheuristics – that approximate best solutions on large instances. In this article, we firstly present an efficient exact method, called the two-phases method. We apply it to a biobjective Flow Shop Problem to find the optimal set of solutions. Exact methods are limited by the size of the instances, so we propose an original cooperation between this exact method and a Genetic Algorithm to obtain good results on large instances. Results obtained are promising and show that cooperation between antagonist optimization methods could be very efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja, R.K., Ergun, A., Orlin, J.B., Punnen, A.P.: A survey of very large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl. Math. 123(1-3), 75–102 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Basseur, M., Seynhaeve, F., Talbi, E.-G.: Design of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: Application to the flow-shop scheduling problem. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC 2002, Honolulu, USA, pp. 1151–1156 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basseur, M., Seynhaeve, F., Talbi, E.-G.: Adaptive mechanisms for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. In: Congress on Engineering in System Application CESA 2003, Lille, France (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coello Coello, C.A., Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Evolutionary algorithms for solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Du, J., Leung, J.Y.-T.: Minimizing total tardiness on one machine is np-hard. Mathematics of operations research 15, 483–495 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, R.L., Lawler, E.L., Lenstra, J.K., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G.: Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5, 287–326 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Haimes, Y., Ladson, L., Wismer, D.: On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Transaction on system, Man and Cybernetics, 269–297 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, Y.-D.: Minimizing total tardiness in permutation flowshops. European Journal of Operational Research 33, 541–551 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: On metrics for comparing non-dominated sets. In: IEEE Service Center (ed.) Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), Piscataway, New Jersey, May 2002, vol. 1, pp. 711–716 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lemesre, J.: Algorithme parallèle exact pour l’optimisation multi-objectif: application à l’ordonnancement. Master’s thesis, University of Lille (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lenstra, J.K., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G., Brucker, P.: Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1, 343–362 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Meunier, H., Talbi, E.G., Reininger, P.: A multiobjective genetic algorithm for radio network optimisation. In: CEC, July 2000, vol. 1, pp. 317–324. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nagar, A., Haddock, J., Heragu, S.: Multiple and bicriteria scheduling: A litterature survey. European journal of operational research (81), 88–104 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajendran, C.: Heuristics for scheduling in flowshop with multiple objectives. European journal of operational research (82), 540–555 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sayin, S., Karabati, S.: A bicriteria approach to the two-machine flow shop scheduling problem. European journal of operational research (113), 435–449 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sivrikaya, F., Ulusoy, G.: A bicriteria two-machine permutation flowshop problem. European journal of operational research (107), 414–430 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Taillard, E.: Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems. European Journal of Operations Research 64, 278–285 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Talbi, E.-G.: A taxonomy of hybrid metaheuristics. Journal of Heuristics 8, 541–564 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Talbi, E.G., Rahoual, M., Mabed, M.H., Dhaenens, C.: A hybrid evolutionary approach for multicriteria optimization problems: Application to the flow shop. In: Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D.W. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 416–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Visée, M., Teghem, J., Pirlot, M., Ulungu, E.L.: The two phases method and branch and bound procedures to solve the bi-objective knapsack problem. Journal of Global Optimization 12, 139–155 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications. Master’s thesis, Swiss federal Institute of technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, (November 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D.W. (eds.): EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Basseur, M., Lemesre, J., Dhaenens, C., Talbi, EG. (2004). Cooperation between Branch and Bound and Evolutionary Approaches to Solve a Bi-objective Flow Shop Problem. In: Ribeiro, C.C., Martins, S.L. (eds) Experimental and Efficient Algorithms. WEA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3059. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24838-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24838-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22067-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24838-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics