Abstract
Research Questions: What are the relationships between unit tests and between unit tests and methods under test? What can be gained by making this relationships explicit? How does the concept of method examples compare with other possible techniques to relate this entities?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schuh, P.: Recovery, redemption and Extreme Programming. IEEE Computer 18, 34–41 (2001)
Gälli, M., Nierstrasz, O., Wuyts, R.: Partial ordering tests by coverage sets. Technical Report IAM-03-013, Institut für Informatik, Universität Bern, Switzerland (2003), Technical Report
Schärli, N., Ducasse, S., Nierstrasz, O., Black, A.: Traits: Composable units of behavior. In: Cardelli, L. (ed.) ECOOP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2743, pp. 248–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gälli, M. (2004). Correlating Unit Tests and Methods under Test. In: Eckstein, J., Baumeister, H. (eds) Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering. XP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3092. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22137-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24853-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive