Skip to main content

OntoEdit Empowering SWAP: a Case Study in Supporting DIstributed, Loosely-Controlled and evolvInG Engineering of oNTologies (DILIGENT)

  • Conference paper
The Semantic Web: Research and Applications (ESWS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3053))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge management solutions relying on central repositories sometimes have not met expectations, since users often create knowledge ad-hoc using their individual vocabulary and using their own decentral IT infrastructure (e.g., their laptop). To improve knowledge management for such decentralized and individualized knowledge work, it is necessary to, first, provide a corresponding IT infrastructure and to, second, deal with the harmonization of different vocabularies/ontologies. In this paper, we briefly sketch the technical peer-to-peer platform that we have built, but then we focus on the harmonization of the participating ontologies.

Thereby, the objective of this harmonization is to avoid the worst incongruencies by having users share a core ontology that they can expand for local use at their will and individual needs. The task that then needs to be solved is one of distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. We have performed along these lines. To support the ontology engineering process in the case study we have furthermore extended the existing ontology engineering environment, OntoEdit. The case study process and the extended tool are presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schreiber, G., et al.: Knowledge Engineering and Management — The CommonKADS Methodology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.): Processes and Foundations for Virtual Organizations. IFIP International Federation For Information Processin, vol. 262. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P., Mameli, G., Nori, M.: Peer-mediated distributed knowledge management. In: [30] (to appear 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrig, M., Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., Studer, R., Tempich, C.: The swap data and metadata model for semantics-based peer-to-peer systems. In: Schillo, M., Klusch, M., Müller, J., Tianfield, H. (eds.) MATES 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2831, pp. 144–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Klyne, G., Carroll, J.J.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

  6. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDFSchema. In: [31], pp. 54–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gong, L.: Project JXTA: A technology overview. Technical report, Sun Micros. Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broekstra, J.: SeRQL: Sesame RDF query language. In: Ehrig, M., et al. (eds.) SWAP Deliverable 3.2 Method Design, pp. 55–68 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karvounarakis, G., et al.: Querying RDF descriptions for community web portals. In: Proceedings of The French National Conference on Databases 2001 (BDA 2001), Agadir, Maroc, pp. 133–144 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sure, Y., Angele, J., Staab, S.: OntoEdit: Multifaceted inferencing for ontology engineering. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S., Aberer, K. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics I. LNCS, vol. 2800, pp. 128–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.: Evolving Ontologies in Distributed and Dynamic Settings. In: Fensel, D., Giunchiglia, F., McGuinness, D., Williams, M. (eds.) Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 365–374. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Staab, S., Schnurr, H.P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 (2001), Special Issue on Knowledge Management

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D., Steve, G.: Ontology integration: Experiences with medical terminologies. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 163–178. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. In: Advanced Information and Knowlege Processing, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.: A Methodology for Ontology Integration. In: Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), pp. 131–138. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1995’ s WS on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noy, N., Klein, M.: Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stojanovic, L., et al.: User-driven ontology evolution management. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, p. 285. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45, 61–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Noy, N., Musen, M.: The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Technical report, SMI, Stanford University, CA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34, 1–47 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L.: Managing multiple and distributed ontologies on the semantic web. The VLDB Journal 12, 286–302 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noy, N., Fergerson, R., Musen, M.: The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Arpírez, J.C., et al.: WebODE: a scalable workbench for ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the First Int. Conf. on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP), Victoria, B.C., Canada, October 21-23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Farquhar, A., et al.: The ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction. Technical report KSL 96-26, Stanford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sure, Y., Erdmann, M., Angele, J., Staab, S., Studer, R., Wenke, D.: OntoEdit: Collaborative ontology development for the semantic web. In: [31], pp. 221–235

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pease, A., Li, J.: Agent-mediated knowledge engineering collaboration. In: [30], pp. 405–415

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tennison, J., Shadbolt, N.R.: APECKS: a Tool to Support Living Ontologies. In: Gaines, B., Musen, M. (eds.) 11th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Bases Systems Workshop (KAW 1998), pp. 1–20 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Golbeck, J., Fragoso, G., Hartel, F., Hendler, J., Parsia, B., Oberthaler, J.: The national cancer institute’s thesaurus and ontology. Journal of Web Semantics 1 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. van Elst, L., et al. (eds.) LNCS (LNAI). Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.): ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pinto, S., Staab, S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C. (2004). OntoEdit Empowering SWAP: a Case Study in Supporting DIstributed, Loosely-Controlled and evolvInG Engineering of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. ESWS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25956-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics