Skip to main content

Benchmarking of Fingerprint Sensors

  • Conference paper
Biometric Authentication (BioAW 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3087))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1127 Accesses

Abstract

At present, there are many competing fingerprint sensors available. Thus, fingerprint sensor benchmarking is necessary but unfortunately no proper methodology is available. This paper attempts to address this deficiency by proposing a new methodology to benchmark the fingerprint sensors. The methodology consists of three metrics and the associated procedures to collect the data in order to compute the proposed metrics. Two small scale experiments are conducted to show the validity and efficacy of the proposed method. These include comparison of the image acquisition performance among various sensors with different skin type and under different weather condition. The effect of number of usage with acquisition performance is also analyzed. Analysis of the results shows that the proposed method does provide a basic sensor benchmarking capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hicklin, R.A.: Comparative Fingerprint Quality and Performance, Mitretek Technology Summaries Summer 2003, pp. 13–16 (2003), http://www.biometrics.org/html/bc2002_sept_program/5_bc0145_HicklinBrief.pdf

  2. Simon-Zorita, D., Ortega-Garcia, J., Sanchez-Asenjo, M., Ganzalez Rodiguez, J.: Minutia Based Enhanced Fingerprint Verification Assessment Relaying on Image Quality Factors. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 891–894 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Utah Department of Public Safety - Bureau of Criminal Identification (US), http://bci.utah.gov/AFIS/Quality.html

  4. Hicklin, A.: Comparative Fingerprint Quality and Performance: Rolls, Slaps and Flaps. In: Biometric Consortium Conference (2002), www.biometrics.org/html/bc2002_sept_program/5_bc0145_HicklinBrief.pdf

  5. Lim, E., Jiang, X.D., Yau, W.Y.: Fingerprint Quality and Validity Analysis. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 469–472 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolle, R.M., Pankanti, S.U., Yao, Y.S.: System and method for determining the quality of fingerprint images. US Patent No 5963656 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A.K., Prabhakar, S.: Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yau, W.Y., Chen, T.P., Morguet, P. (2004). Benchmarking of Fingerprint Sensors. In: Maltoni, D., Jain, A.K. (eds) Biometric Authentication. BioAW 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3087. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25976-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25976-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22499-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25976-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics