Skip to main content

Exploring Relational Structures Via \({\mathcal{F\!LE}}\)

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures at Work (ICCS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3127))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Designing ontologies and specifying axioms of the described domains is an expensive and error-prone task. Thus, we propose a method originating from Formal Concept Analysis which uses empirical data to systematically generate hypothetical axioms about the domain, which are represented to an ontology engineer for decision.

In this paper, we focus on axioms that can be expressed as entailment statements in the description logic \({\mathcal{F\!LE}}\). The proposed technique is an incremental one, therefore, in every new step we have to reuse the axiomatic information acquired so far. We present a sound and complete deduction calculus for \({\mathcal{F\!LE}}\) entailment statements.

We give a detailed description of this multistep algorithm including a technique called empirical attribute reduction and demonstrate the proposed technique using an example from mathematics.

We give a completeness result on the explored information and address the question of algorithm termination. Finally, we discuss possible applications of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F.: Computing a Minimal Representation of the Subsumption Lattice of all Conjunctions of Concepts Defined in a Terminology. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Knowledge Retrieval, Use, and Storage for Efficiency, KRUSE 1995, Santa Cruz, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Practice, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowling, W.F., Gallier, J.H.: Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional Horn formulae. J. Logic Programming 3, 267–284 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganter, B.: Two basic algorithms in concept analysis. FB4-Preprint No 831, TH Darmstadt (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganter, B., Rudolph, S.: Formal Concept Analysis Methods for Dynamic Conceptual Graphs. In: Delugach, H.S., Stumme, G. (eds.) Conceptual Structures: Broadening the Base, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guigues, J.-L., Duquenne, V.: Familles minimales d’implications informatives resultant d’un tableaux de donnés binaires. Math. Sci. Humaines 95 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horrocks, I. et al.: The Ontology Inference Layer OIL, http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/papers.shtml

  10. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Reasoning with individuals for the description logic SHIQ. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) CADE 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNAI), vol. 1831, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I.: Benchmark analysis with fact. In: Dyckhoff, R. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNAI), vol. 1847, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Prediger, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der Formalen Begriffsanalyse. In: Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rudolph, S.: An FCA Method for the Extensional Exploration of Relational Data. In: de Moor, A., Ganter, B. (eds.) Using Conceptual Structures: Contributions to ICCS 2003, Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence 48, 1–26 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sowa, J.: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNAI), vol. 1867, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wille, R.: Conceptual Graphs and Formal Concept Analysis. In: Lukose, D., Delugach, H., Keeler, M., Searle, L., Sowa, J. (eds.) Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zickwolff, M.: Rule Exploration: First Order Logic in Formal Concept Analysis, PhD thesis, TH Darmstadt (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rudolph, S. (2004). Exploring Relational Structures Via \({\mathcal{F\!LE}}\) . In: Wolff, K.E., Pfeiffer, H.D., Delugach, H.S. (eds) Conceptual Structures at Work. ICCS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27769-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27769-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27769-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics