Abstract
This paper presents the real-time model checker RAVEN and related theoretical background. RAVEN augments the efficiency of traditional symbolic model checking with possibilities to describe real-time systems. These extensions rely on multi-terminal binary decision diagrams to represent time delays and time intervals. The temporal logic CCTL is used to specify properties with time constraints. Another noteworthy feature of our model checker is its ability to compose a system description out of communicating modules, so called I/O-interval structures. This modular approach to system description alleviates the omnipresent state explosion problem common to all model checking tools.
The case study of a holonic material transport system demonstrates how such a production automation system can be modeled in our system. We devise a detailed model of all components present in the described system. This model serves as basis for checking real-time properties of the system as well as for computing key properties like system latencies and minimal response times. A translation of the original model also allows application of another time bounded property checker for verification of the holonic production system. Finally, we present an approach combining simulation and formal verification that operates on the same system model. It enables verification of larger designs at the cost of reduced coverage. Only critical states detected during simulation runs are further subjected to exhaustive model checking. We contrast the runtimes and results of our different approaches.
The results described in this article have been achieved in the course of the DFG project GRASP within the DFG Priority Programme 1064.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.E.: Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Vardi, M.Y.: Branching vs. linear time: Final showdown. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2001) (invited paper)
Ruf, J., Kropf, T.: Symbolic verification and analysis of discrete timed systems. Journal on Formal Methods in System Design 23(1), 67–108 (2003)
Emerson, E.A., Mok, A.K., Sistla, A.P., Srinivasan, J.: Quantitative temporal reasoning. In: Clarke, E., Kurshan, R.P. (eds.) CAV 1990. LNCS, vol. 531, pp. 136–145. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Ruf, J., Kropf, T.: Modeling and checking networks of communicating real-time process. In: Pierre, L., Kropf, T. (eds.) CHARME 1999. LNCS, vol. 1703, pp. 256–279. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Ruf, J., Hoffmann, D.W., Kropf, T., Rosenstiel, W.: Simulation-guided property checking based on a multi-valued AR-automata. [30] 742–748
Damm, W., Harel, D.: LSCs: Breathing life into message sequence charts. Journal on Formal Methods in System Design 19(1), 45–80 (2001)
Object Management Group (OMG): Unified Modeling Language (UML), Version 1.5. Document formal/03-03-01 (2003), http://www.omg.org
Klose, J., Kropf, T., Ruf, J.: A visual approach to validating system level designs. In: 15th International Symposium on Systems Synthesis, pp. 186–191. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 411–420. ACM Press, New York (1999)
Flake, S., Müller, W., Ruf, J.: Structured english for model checking specification. In: Methoden und Beschreibungssprachen zur Modellierung und Verifikation von Schaltungen und Systemen. 3. GI/ITG/GMM Workshop, pp. 99–108. VDE Verlag (2002)
Flake, S., Müller, W., Ruf, J.: A UML/OCL extension for state-oriented temporal properties with applications for manufacturing systems. In: Ehrig, H., Damm, W., Desel, J., Große-Rhode, M., Reif, W., Schnieder, E., Westkämper, E. (eds.) INT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3147, pp. 206–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Reif, W., Schellhorn, G., Vollmer, T., Ruf, J.: Correctness of efficient real-time model checking. Journal of Universal Computer Science, Special Issue on Tools for System Design and Verification 7(2), 194–209 (2001)
Bryant, R.E.: Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams. ACM Computing Surveys 24(3), 293–318 (1992)
Bahar, R.I., Frohm, E.A., Gaona, C.M., Hachtel, G.D., Macii, E., Pardo, A., Somenzi, F.: Algebraic decision diagrams and their applications. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ACM International Conference on CAD, pp. 188–191. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1993)
Grötker, T., Liao, S., Martin, G., Swan, S.: System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Müller, W., Ruf, J., Hoffmann, D.W., Gerlach, J., Kropf, T., Rosenstiel, W.: The simulation semantics of SystemC. [30] 64–70
Ruf, J., Peranandam, P.M., Kropf, T., Rosenstiel, W.: Bounded property checking with symbolic simulation. In: Forum on Specification and Design Languages (2003)
Ruf, J.: RAVEN: Real-time analyzing and verification. Technical Report WSI 2000-3, University of Tübingen (2000)
Campos, S.V., Clarke, E.M.: Real-time symbolic model checking for discrete time models. In: Rus, T., Rattray, C. (eds.) Theories and Experiences for Real-Time System Development. Amast Series In Computing, vol. 2, pp. 129–145. World Scientific Publishing Corporation, Inc., River Edge (1994)
Iwashita, H., Nakata, T.: Forward model checking techniques oriented to buggy designs. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ACM International Conference on CAD, pp. 400–404. ACM and IEEE Computer Society Press (1997)
Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Strichman, O., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking. In: Zelkowitz, M. (ed.) Highly Dependable Software. Advances in Computers, vol. 58, Academic Press, London (2003)
ISO/IEC: Programming Languages – C++. 2. edn. Number 14882:2003 in JTC1/SC22 – Programming languages, their environment and system software interfaces. International Organization for Standardization (2003)
VA Software Corporation, Open SystemC Initiative: Open SystemC Initiative (2004), www.systemc.org
Krebs, A., Ruf, J.: Optimized temporal logic compilation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, Special Issue on Tools for System Design and Verification 9(2), 120–137 (2003)
Flake, S., Müller, W.: A UML profile for MFERT. Technical Report 4, C-LAB Paderborn (2002)
Bengtsson, J., Larsen, K.G., Larsson, F., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: UPPAAL - a tool suite for automatic verification of real-time systems. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Sontag, E.D. (eds.) Hybrid Systems III: Verification and Control, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Yovine, S.: KRONOS: A verification tool for real-time systems. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 1(1-2), 123–133 (1997)
Campos, S.V.A., Clarke, E.M., Minea, M.: The Verus tool: A quantitative approach to the formal verification of real-time systems. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 452–455. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Nebel, W., Jerraya, A. (eds.): Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE 2001. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruf, J., Weiss, R.J., Kropf, T., Rosenstiel, W. (2004). Modeling and Formal Verification of Production Automation Systems. In: Ehrig, H., et al. Integration of Software Specification Techniques for Applications in Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27863-4_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27863-4_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23135-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27863-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive