Skip to main content

Using Relevance to Speed Up Inference

Some Empirical Results

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence – SBIA 2004 (SBIA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the main problems in using logic for solving problems is the high computational costs involved in inference. In this paper, we propose the use of a notion of relevance in order to cut the search space for a solution. Instead of trying to infer a formula α directly from a large knowledge base K, we consider first only the most relevant sentences in K for the proof. If those are not enough, the set can be increased until, at the worst case, we consider the whole base K.

We show how to define a notion of relevance for first-order logic with equality and analyze the results of implementing the method and testing it over more than 700 problems from the TPTP problem library.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hamscher, W., Console, L., de Kleer, J. (eds.): Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, J., Hendler, J., Tare, A. (eds.): Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux - Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.): Handbook of Automated Reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaerf, M., Cadoli, M.: Tractable reasoning via approximation. Artificial Intelligence 74, 249–310 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, A., Belnap, N.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. da Costa, N.C.: Calculs propositionnels pour les systémes formels inconsistants. Comptes Rendus d’Academie des Sciences de Paris 257 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wassermann, R.: Resource-Bounded Belief Revision. PhD thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation — University of Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Finger, M., Wassermann, R.: Expressivity and control in limited reasoning. In: van Harmelen, F. (ed.) 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2002), Lyon, France, pp. 272–276. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein, R.L.: The semantic foundations of logic. Propositional Logic. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol. 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodrigues, O.T.: A Methodology for Iterated Information Change. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krajewski, S.: Relatedness logic. Reports on Mathematical Logic 20, 7–14 (1986)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McCune, W., Wos, L.: Otter: The cade-13 competition incarnations. Journal of Automated Reasoning (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riani, J.: Towards an efficient inference procedure through syntax based relevance. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of São Paulo (2004), Available at http://www.ime.usp.br/~joselyto/mestrado

  16. Ribeiro, F.P.: otterlib – a C library for theorem proving. Technical Report RT-MAC 2002-09, Computer Science Department, University of São Paulo (2002), Available from http://www.ime.usp.br/~fr/otterlib/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Riani, J., Wassermann, R. (2004). Using Relevance to Speed Up Inference. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence – SBIA 2004. SBIA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28645-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28645-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23237-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28645-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics