Abstract
The ability to lead collaborative discussions and appropriately scaffold learning has been identified as one of the central advantages of human tutorial interaction [6]. In order to reproduce the effectiveness of human tutors, many developers of tutorial dialogue systems have taken the approach of identifying human tutorial tactics and then incorporating them into their systems. Equally important as understanding the tactics themselves is understanding how human tutors decide which tactics to use. We argue that these decisions are made based not only on student actions and the content of student utterances, but also on the meta-communicative information conveyed through spoken utterances (e.g. pauses, disfluencies, intonation). Since this information is less frequent or unavailable in typed input, tutorial dialogue systems with speech interfaces have the potential to be more effective than those without. This paper gives an overview of the Spoken Conversational Tutor (SCoT) that we have built and describes how we are beginning to make use of spoken language information in SCoT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belvin, R., Burns, R., Hein, C.: Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Paper H01-1016 (2001)
Bhatt, K.: Classifying student hedges and affect in human tutoring sessions for the CIRCSIM-Tutor intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology (2004)
Bloom, B.S.: The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–16 (1984)
Brennan, S.E., Williams, M.: The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 383–398 (1995)
Bulitko, V., Wilkins., D.C.: Automated instructor assistant for ship damage control. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1999 (1999)
Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.G.: Learning from tutoring. Cognitive Science 25, 471–533 (2001)
Clark, B., Lemon, O., Gruenstein, A., Bratt, E., Fry, J., Peters, S., Pon-Barry, H., Schultz, K., Thomsen-Gray, Z., Treeratpituk, P.: A General Purpose Architecture for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjaer, L., van Kuppevelt, J. (eds.) Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, Kluwer, Dordrecht (in press)
Clark, H.H.: Using Language. University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C.: Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal 19, 237–248 (1982)
Transcripts of face-to-face and keyboard-to-keyboard tutorial dialogues, between physiology professors and first-year students at Rush Medical College (received from M. Evens)
Evens, M., Michael, J.: One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Machines. Computer Science Department, Illinois Institute of Technology (unpublished manuscript)
Fox, B.: Human Tutorial Dialogue. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (1993)
Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring sessions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9, 1–28 (1995)
Grasso, M.A., Finin, T.W.: Task Integration in Multimodal Speech Recognition Environments. Crossroads 3(3), 19–22 (1997)
Gruenstein, A.: Conversational Interfaces: A Domain-Independent Architecture for Task-Oriented Dialogues. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Stanford University (2002)
Hausmann, R., Chi, M.T.H.: Can a computer interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology 7(1), 4–15 (2002)
Hauptmann, A.G., Rudnicky, A.I.: Talking to Computers: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28(6), 583–604 (1988)
Heffernan, N.T.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems have Forgotten the Tutor: Adding a Cognitive Model of Human Tutors. Dissertation. Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report CMU-CS-01-127 (2001)
Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)
Lemon, O., Gruenstein, A., Peters, S.: Collaborative activities and multitasking in dialogue systems. In: Gardent, C. (ed.) Traitement Automatique des Langues (TAL, special issue on dialogue), vol. 43(2), pp. 131–154 (2002)
Litman, D., Forbes, K.: Recognizing Emotions from Student Speech in Tutoring Dialogues. In: Proc. of the IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop, ASRU (2003)
Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C., Bautista, L., Mathews, E., the Tutoring Reasearch Group: Evaluating student learning gains in two versions of AutoTutor. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proceedings of Artificial intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future, pp. 286–293 (2001)
Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C.: Fourteen facts about human tutoring: Food for thought for ITS developers. In: Proceedings of the AIED 2003 Workshop on Tutorial Dialogue Systems: With a View Towards the Classroom (2003)
Rosé, C., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., Weinstein, A.: Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In: Proc. of AI in Education 2001 (2001)
Rosé, C.P., Litman, D., Bhembe, D., Forbes, K., Silliman, S., Srivastava, R., VanLehn, K.: A Comparison on Tutor and Student Behavior in Speech Versus Text Based Tutoring. In: Proc. of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Educational Applications of NLP (2003)
Smith, V.L., Clark, H.H.: On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 25–38 (1993)
Xu, W., Rudnicky, A.: Language modeling for dialog system. In: Proceedings of ICSLP 2000, Paper B1-06 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pon-Barry, H., Clark, B., Schultz, K., Bratt, E.O., Peters, S. (2004). Advantages of Spoken Language Interaction in Dialogue-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22948-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30139-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive