Skip to main content

Untangling Unstructured Cyclic Flows – A Solution Based on Continuations

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (OTM 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3290))

Abstract

We present a novel transformation method that allows us to map unstructured cyclic business process models to functionally equivalent workflow specifications that support structured cycles only. Our solution is based on a continuation semantics, which we developed for the graphical representation of a process model. By using a rule-based transformation method originally developed in compiler theory, we can untangle the unstructured flow while solving a set of abstract continuation equations. The generated workflow code can be optimized by controlling the order in which the transformation rules are applied.

We then present an implementation of the transformation method that directly manipulates an object-oriented model of the Business Process Execution Language for Web Services BPEL4WS. The implementation maps abstract continuation equations to the BPEL4WS control-flow graph. The transformation rules manipulate the links in the graph such that all cycles are removed and replaced by equivalent structured activities. A byproduct of this work is that, if a continuation semantics is adopted for BPEL4WS, its restriction to acyclic links can be dropped.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, T., et al.: Business process execution language for web services (2002), www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bpel/

  2. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison Wesley, Reading (1898)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W., van Hee, K.: Workflow Management Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W., Desel, J., Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: A vicious circle. In: Proceedings of theWorkshop on EPK, pp. 7–18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds, J.: The discoveries of continuations. LISP and Symbolic Computation 6, 233–247 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds, J.: Theories of Programming Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhm, C., Jacopini, G.: Flow diagrams, turing machines and languages with only two formation rules. Communications of the ACM 9, 366–371 (1966)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ammarguellat, Z.: A control-flow normalization algorithm and its complexity. Software Engineering 13, 237–251 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erosa, A., Hendren, L.: Taming control flow: A structured approach to eliminating goto statements. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Languages (ICCL), pp. 229–240. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson, W., Kasami, T., Tokura, N.: On the capabilities of while, repeat, and exit statements. Communications of the ACM 16, 503–512 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hecht, M., Ullman, J.: Flow graph reducibility. SIAM Journal of Computing 1, 188–202 (1972)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauser, R., Koehler, J.: Compiling process graphs into executable code. In: Third International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aho, A., Sethi, R., Ullman, J.: Compilers–Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amsden, J., Gardner, T., Griffin, C., Iyengar, S., Knapman, J.: UML profile for automated business processes with a mapping to BPEL 1.0. IBM Alphaworks, http://dwdemos.alphaworks.ibm.com/wstk/common/wstkdocservices/demos/uml2bpel/docs/ UMLProfileForBusinessProcesses1.0.pdf (2003)

  15. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language – Precise Modeling with UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koehler, J., Hauser, R. (2004). Untangling Unstructured Cyclic Flows – A Solution Based on Continuations. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3290. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23663-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30468-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics