Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3292))

Abstract

The paper examines how to address the need for a production process for e-learning resources to include human generated metadata, and considers how users will exploit this metadata. It identifies situations in which human production of metadata is unavoidable, and examines fundamental problems concerned with human metadata generation such as motivation and shared understanding. It proposes and discusses some methods to exploit endemic motivational factors within communities in an attempt to ensure good quality human generated metadata, and identifies how ontological constructs can support the exploitation of such metadata. The relevance of these methods to the semantic web in general is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IEEE, IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, in IEEE Std 1484.12.1-2002. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. p. i-32 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sebastiani, F.: Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34(1) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lam, W., Ruiz, M., Srinivasan, P.: Automatic Text Categorization and Its Application to Text Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(6), 865–879 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liddy, E.D., et al.: Automatic metadata generation & evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, ACM Press, Tampere (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deerwester, S., et al.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the Society for Information Science 41(6), 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. METAe - Meta Data Engine. Vol. 2003, The METAe project group (2002), http://metae.aib.uni-linz.ac.at/

  7. Brunelli, R., Mich, O., Modena, C.M.: A Survey on the Automatic Indexing of Video Data. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 10(2), 78–112 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ngan, K.N., et al. (eds.): Special issue on segmentation, description and retrieval of video content (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall, C.: Making Metadata: a study of metadata creation for a mixed physical-digital collection. In: ACM Digital Libraries 1998 Conference, Pittsburgh, PA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Currier, S., et al.: Quality Assurance for Digital Learning Object Repositories: Issues for the Metadata Creation Process. ALT-J, research in Learning Technology 12(1), 6–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chan, L.M.: Inter-Indexer Consistency in Subject Cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries 8(4), 349–358 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. GEM, The Gateway to Educational Materials (2003), http://www.thegateway.org/

  13. Brasher, A., McAndrew, P.: Metadata vocabularies for describing learning objects: implementation and exploitation issues. Learning Technology 5(1) (2003), http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/january2003/

  14. Kabel, S., Hoog, R.d., Wielinga, B.J.: Consistency in Indexing Learning Objects: an Empirical Investigation. In: ED-Media 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. IMS, IMS Vocabulary Definition Exchange (2004), http://www.imsglobal.org/vdex/

  16. Clark, J.: XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, W3C (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt

  17. Sharples, M., et al.: Socio-Cognitive Engineering: A Methodology for the Design of Human-Centred Technology. European Journal of Operational Research 136(2), 310–323 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. UKeU, Postgraduate Certificate in Online and Distance Education 2003/4. (2003), http://www.ukeu.com/courses/connectedeconomy/courses_connectedeconomy_programme.php?site=

  19. Weller, M., Pegler, C., Mason, R.: Working with learning objects - some pedagogical suggestions (2003), http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/m.j.weller/pub/altc.doc

  20. McGuinness, D.L., Harmelen, F.v.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  21. Abecker, A., Tellmann, R.: Analysis of Interaction between Semantic Web Languages, P2P architectures, and Agents. In: 2003, SWWS – Semantic Web Enabled Web Services project IST-2002-37134, http://swws.semanticweb.org/public_doc/D1.3.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brasher, A., McAndrew, P. (2004). Human-Generated Learning Object Metadata. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops. OTM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3292. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_83

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23664-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30470-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics