Skip to main content

Patching Syntax in OWL Ontologies

  • Conference paper
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2004 (ISWC 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3298))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An analysis of OWL ontologies represented in RDF/XML on the Web shows that a majority are OWL Full. In many cases this may not be through a desire to use the expressivity provided by OWL Full, but is rather due to syntactic errors or accidental misuse of the vocabulary. We present a “rogues gallery” of common errors encountered, and describe how robust parsers that attempt to cope with such errors can be produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechhofer, S.: OWL Web Ontology Language Parsing OWL in RDF/XML. W3C Working Group Note, World Wide Web Consortium (January 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-parsing

  2. Bechhofer, S., Carroll, J.J.: Parsing OWL DL: Trees or Triples? In: Proceedings of World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2004, May 2004, ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bechhofer, S., Volz, R., Lord, P.: Cooking the Semantic Web with the OWL API. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 659–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean, M., Schreiber, G.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  6. Hayes, P.: RDF Semantics. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

  7. Marsh, J.: XML Base. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/

  8. Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Abstract Syntax and Semantics. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bechhofer, S., Volz, R. (2004). Patching Syntax in OWL Ontologies. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds) The Semantic Web – ISWC 2004. ISWC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3298. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23798-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30475-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics