Skip to main content

A Relevance Feedback Model for Fractal Summarization

  • Conference paper
Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization (ICADL 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3334))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of the recent information explosion, there is an increasing demand for automatic summarization, and human abstractors often synthesize summaries that are based on sentences that have been extracted by machine. However, the quality of machine-generated summaries is not high. As a special application of information retrieval systems, the precision of automatic summarization can be improved by user relevance feedback, in which the human abstractor can direct the sentence extraction process and useful information can be retrieved efficiently. Automatic summarization with relevance feedback is a helpful tool to assist professional abstractors in generating summaries, and in this work we propose a relevance feedback model for fractal summarization. The results of the experiment show that relevance feedback effectively improves the performance of automatic fractal summarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnsley, M.F., Jacquin, A.E.: Application of Recurrent Iterated Function Systems to Images. In: Proc. SPIE Visual Comm. and Image Processing 1988, vol. 1001, pp. 122–131 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baxendale, P.: Machine-Made Index for Technical Literature - An Experiment. IBM Journal, 354–361 (October) (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cowie, J., Mahesh, K., Nirenburg, S., Zajaz, R.: MINDS-Multilingual Interactive Document Summarization. In: Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization, California, USA, pp. 131–132 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, D., et al.: Analysis of Binary Data., 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craven, T.C.: Human Creation of Abstracts with Selected Computer Assistance Tools. Information Research 3(4), 4 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Craven, T.C.: Abstracts Produced Using Computer Assistance. J. of the American Soc. for Info. Sci. 51(8), 745–756 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edmundson, H.P.: New Method in Automatic Extraction. J. ACM 16(2), 264–285 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Endres-Niggemeyer, B., Maier, E., Sigel, A.: How to Implement a Naturalistic Model of Abstracting: Four Core Working Steps of an Expert Abstractor. Information Processing and Management 31(5), 631–674 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein, J., et al.: Summarizing Text Documents: Sentence Selection and Evaluation Metrics. In: Proc. SIGIR 1999, pp. 121–128 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hearst, M.: Subtopic Structuring for Full-Length Document Access. In: Proc. SIGIR 1993, pp. 56–68 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacquin, A.E.: Fractal Image Coding: a Review. Proc. IEEE 81(10), 1451–1465 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kendall, M., Gibbons, J.D.: Rank Correlation Methods, 5th edn. Edward Arnold, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Koike, H.: Fractal Views: A Fractal-Based Method for Controlling Information Display. ACM Tran. on Information Systems, ACM 13(3), 305–323 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kupiec, J., et al.: A Trainable Document Summarizer. In: Proc. SIGIR 1995, Seattle, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lam-Adesina, M., Jones, G.J.F.: Applying Summarization Techniques for Term Selection in Relevance Feedback. In: Proc. SIGIR 2001, pp. 1–9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, Y., Hovy, E.H.: Identifying Topics by Position. In: Proc. of Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (ANLP-1997), Washington, DC, pp. 283–290 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 159–165 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morris, G., Kasper, G.M., Adams, D.A.: The Effect and Limitation of Automated Text Condensing on Reading Comprehension Performance. Info. Sys. Research, 17–35 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ogden, W., Cowie, J., Davis, M., Ludovik, E., Molina-Salgado, H., Shin, H.: Getting Information from Documents You Cannot Read: an Interactive Cross-Language Text Retrieval and Summarization System. In: Joint ACM DL/SIGIR Workshop on Multilingual Information Discovery and Access (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rocchio, J.: Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval. In: The Smart Retrieval System, pp. 313–323. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval. Information Processing and Management 24, 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salton, G., et al.: Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback. J. America Soc. for Info. Sci. 41, 288–297 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teufel, S., Moens, M.: Sentence Extraction as a Classification Task. In: Workshop of Intelligent and Scalable Text Summarization, ACL/EACL (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsujimoto, S., Asada, H.: Understanding Multi-articled Documents. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Atlantic City, N.J, pp. 551–556 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, F.L., Yang, C.C.: Automatic Summarization of Chinese and English Parallel Documents. In: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Asian Digital Libraries, Kuala Lumpur (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, C.C., Li, K.W.: Automatic Construction of English/Chinese Parallel Corpora. J. of American Soc. for Info. Sci. and Tech. 54(8), 730–742 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, C.C., Wang, F.L.: Fractal Summarization for Mobile Device to Access Large Documents on the Web. In: Proc. 12th Int. WWW Conf, Budapest, Hungary (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, C.C., Wang, F.L.: Fractal Summarization: Summarization Based on Fractal Theory. In: Proc. SIGIR 2003, Toronto, Canada (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, F.L., Yang, C.C. (2004). A Relevance Feedback Model for Fractal Summarization. In: Chen, Z., Chen, H., Miao, Q., Fu, Y., Fox, E., Lim, Ep. (eds) Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization. ICADL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3334. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30544-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30544-6_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24030-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30544-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics