Skip to main content

Optimal Load Balancing in Insensitive Data Networks

  • Conference paper
Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks (QoS-IP 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 3375))

Abstract

Bonald et al. have recently characterized a set of insensitive dynamic load balancing policies by modelling the system as a Whittle network. In particular, they derived optimal “decentralized” strategies based on limited state information and evaluated their performance in simple example networks. In this paper, we consider the specific case of a data network where each flow can be routed on one of a set of alternative routes. By using the linear programming formulation of MDP theory we are able to analyze optimal routing policies that utilize the full global state information. In the ordinary LP formulation of MDP theory, the global balance condition appears as a linear constraint on the decision variables. In order to retain insensitivity, we impose stricter detailed balance conditions as constraints. As a further extension, the MDP-LP approach allows joint optimization of the routing and resource sharing, in contrast to the earlier work where the resource sharing policy was required to be separately balanced and fixed in advance. The various schemes are compared numerically in a toy network. The advantage given by global state information is in this case negligible, whereas the joint routing and resource sharing gives a clear improvement. The requirement of insensitivity still implies some performance penalty in comparison with the best sensitive policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Combe, M.B., Boxma, O.J.: Optimization of static traffic allocation policies. Theoretical Computer Science 125, 17–43 (1994)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ephremides, A., Varaiya, P., Walrand, J.: A simple dynamic routing problem. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 25, 690–693 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Towsley, D., Panayotis, D., Sparaggis, P., Cassandras, C.: Optimal routing and buffer allocation for a class of finite capacity queueing systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37, 1446–1451 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitt, W.: Deciding which queue to join: some counterexamples. Operations Research 34, 226–244 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonald, T., Proutière, A.: Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks. Performance Evaluation 49, 193–209 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonald, T., Prouti‘ere, A.: Insensitivite bandwidth sharing in data networks. Queueing Systems and Applications 44, 69–100 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonald, T., Jonckheere, M., Proutière, A.: Insensitive dynamic load balancing. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnan, K.: Markov decision algorithms for dynamic routing. IEEE Communications Magazine 28, 66–69 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Altman, E.: Applications of Markov decision processes in communication networks: A survey. In: Handbook of Markov Decision Processes. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tijms, H.: Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Feinberg, E.A., Schwartz, A. (eds.): Handbook ofMarkov Decision Processes - Methods and Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonald, T., Proutière, A.: On performance bounds for balanced fairness. Performance Evaluation 55, 25–50 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Massoulié, L., Roberts, J.W.: Arguments in favour of admission control for TCP flows. In: Proceedings of ITC, vol. 16 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leino, J., Virtamo, J. (2005). Optimal Load Balancing in Insensitive Data Networks. In: Ajmone Marsan, M., Bianchi, G., Listanti, M., Meo, M. (eds) Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks. QoS-IP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30573-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30573-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24557-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30573-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics