Skip to main content

Ranking the NTCIR Systems Based on Multigrade Relevance

  • Conference paper
Information Retrieval Technology (AIRS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3411))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

At NTCIR-4, new retrieval effectiveness metrics called Q-measure and R-measure were proposed for evaluation based on multigrade relevance. This paper shows that Q-measure inherits both the reliability of noninterpolated Average Precision and the multigrade relevance capability of Average Weighted Precision through a theoretical analysis, and then verify the above claim through experiments by actually ranking the systems submitted to the NTCIR-3 CLIR Task. Our experiments confirm that the Q-measure ranking is very highly correlated with the Average Precision ranking and that it is more reliable than Average Weighted Precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Della Mea, V., Mizzaro, S.: Measuring Retrieval Effectiveness: A New Proposal and a First Experimental Validation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(6), 530–543 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: IR Evaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents. In: ACM SIGIR 2000 Proceedings, pp. 41–48 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated Gain-Based Evaluation of IR Techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20–4, 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kando, et al.: Information Retrieval System Evaluation using Multi-Grade Relevance Judgments - Discussion on Averageable Single-Numbered Measures (in Japanese). IPSJ SIG Notes 63–12, 105–112 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai, T., et al.: Toshiba BRIDJE at NTCIR-4 CLIR: Monolingual/Bilingual IR and Flexible Feedback. NTCIR-4 Proceedings (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sakai, T.: New Performance Metrics based on Multigrade Relevance: Their Application to Question Answering. In: NTCIR-4 Proceedings (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sakai, T. (2005). Ranking the NTCIR Systems Based on Multigrade Relevance. In: Myaeng, S.H., Zhou, M., Wong, KF., Zhang, HJ. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3411. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31871-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31871-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25065-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31871-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics