Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap Between AUML and Implementation Using IOM/T

  • Conference paper
Programming Multi-Agent Systems (ProMAS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3346))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multi-agent systems are attractive means for developing complex software systems. However, multi-agent systems themselves tend to be complex, and certain difficulties exist in developing them. One of the difficulties is the gap between design and implementation especially for interaction protocols. In this paper, we propose a new interaction protocol description language called IOM/T. Interaction protocols described using IOM/T have clear correspondence with AUML sequence diagrams and the description can be consolidated into a single unit of IOM/T code. Then, we show how the process of implementing Java-based agent-platform code from AUML design can be carried out, and how IOM/T effectively bridges the gap between design and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A., Suna, A.: A mobile agents platform; architecture, mobility and security elements. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M.M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3346, pp. 126–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbuceanu, M., Fox, M.S.: Cool: A language for describing coordination in multiagent systems. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference oil Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 17–24. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Moldt, D., Lamersdorf, W.: Goal representation for BDI agent systems. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M.M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3346, pp. 44–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Burmeister, B., Haddadi, A., Sundermeyer, K.: Generic, configurable, cooperation protocols for multi-agent systems. In: Müller, J.P., Castelfranchi, C. (eds.) MAAMAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 957, p. 157. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. CSELT. JADE, http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/

  6. Dinkloh, M., Nimis, J.: A tool for integrated design and implementation of conversations in multi-agent systems. In: Programming Multiagent Systems languages, frameworks, techniques and tools ProMAS 2003 Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. FIPA. Agent UML, http://www.auml.org/

  8. FIPA. FIPA Modeling: Interaction Diagrams. http://www.auml.org/auml/documents/ID-03-07-02.pdf

  9. Huget, M.-P.: Generating code for Agent UML sequence diagrams. Technical report, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huget, M.-P.: Model checking Agent UML protocol diagrams. Technical report, the department of computer science, University of Liverpool (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishida, T.: Q: A scenario description language for interactive agents. IEEE Computer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuwabara, K., Ishida, T., Osato, N.: Agentalk: Describing multiagent coordination protocols with inheritance (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jennings, N.R., Paurobally, S.: Developing agent interaction protocols using graphical and logical methodologies. In: Programming Multiagent Systems languages, frameworks, techniques and tools ProMAS 2003 Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tahara, Y., Ohsuga, A., Honiden, S.: Mobile agent security with the IPEditor development tool and the Mobile UNITY language. In: Proc. of Agents 2001, pp. 656–662. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Vitteau, B., Huget, M.-P.: Modularity in interaction protocols. In: Agent communication languages and conversation policies AAMAS 2003 Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: Michael Wooldridge, Nicholas R. Jennings, and David Kinny. The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doi, T., Yoshioka, N., Tahara, Y., Honiden, S. (2005). Bridging the Gap Between AUML and Implementation Using IOM/T. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. ProMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3346. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32260-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32260-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24559-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32260-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics