Skip to main content

Evaluation Framework for Model-Driven Product Line Engineering Tools

  • Chapter
Software Product Lines

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Lagua, R., Muthig, D., Peach, B., Wust, J., Zettel, J.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML (Kobra) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2001) ISBN 0-201-73791-4. http://www.iese.fhg.de/Kobra_Method/

  2. Atlas Transformation Language (ATL) homepage. http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lina/atl. Cited 24 Nov 2005

  3. Becker, M.: Towards a general model of variability in product families. In: Software Variability Management Workshop (SVM 2003). 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blechar, M.J., Driver, M.: Predicts 2004: MDSFs Offset J2EE Complexity, Gartner report, ID Number: SPA-21-5432

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch, J.: Design & Use of Software Architectures - Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2000) ISBN 0-201-67494-7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clauß, M.: Generic modeling using UML extensions for variability. In: Workshop Domain Specific Visual Languages, OOPSLA, USA, October 2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. COMponent-Based INteroperable Enterprise system development (COMBINE), ESPRIT V IST project no. 20893. http://www.opengroup.org/combine/. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  8. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Classification of model transformation approaches. In: 2nd Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications 2003 (OOPSLA’03)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duggan, J., Vecchio, D., Plummer, D.C., Driver, M., Natis Y.V., Hotle, M., Feiman, J., James, G.A., Sinur, J., Pezzini, M., Light, M., Blechar, M.J., Valdes, R., Lanowitz, T.: Hype Cycle for Application Development, 25 June 2004, Gartner report, ID Number: G00120914

    Google Scholar 

  10. Estublier, J., Vega, G., Ionita, A.D.: Composing domain-specific languages for wide-scope software engineering. In: MoDELS 2005 Conference, ed by Briand, L., Williams, C., ISBN3-540-29010-9, pp 69-83

    Google Scholar 

  11. FAct-based Maturity through Institutionalisation Lessons-learned and Involved Exploration of System-family engineering (FAMILIES), ITEA project ip02009, Eureka ™!2023. http://www.esi.es/en/Projects/ Families/. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  12. Gardner, T., Griffin, C., Koehler, J., Hauser, R.: A review of OMG MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations Submissions and Recommendations towards the final Standard, (MetaModeling for MDA Workshop Nov 2003. York, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gartner Group: Application Development Management - Enterprise Applications Development Tools -Evaluation and Selection, Strategic analysis report, Gartner Group, Sept 1996

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield, J., Short, K., Cook, S., Kent, S., Crupi, J.: Software Factories, Assembling Applications with Patterns, Models, Frameworks and Tools (Wiley, New York 2004) ISBN 0-471-20284-3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grønmo, R., Aagedal, J., Solberg, A., Belaunde, M., Rosenthal, P., Faugere, M., Ritter, T., Born, M.: Evaluation of the QVT Merge Language Proposal, MODELWARE project report, SINTEF report number STF90 A05046, ISBN 82-14-03659-3, OMG document ad/2005-03-05. http://www.omg.org/cgi- bin/doc?ad/05-03-05

  16. Grønmo, R., Oldevik, J.: An empirical study of the UML Model Transformation Tool (UMT). In: The 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA), Geneva, Switzerland, Feb 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haugen, Ø., Møller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik, J., Solberg, A.: An MDA-based framework for model-driven product derivation. In: The 8th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, ed by Hamza, M.H. (ACTA, Nov 2004) pp 709-714

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Standards Organization (ISO): ISO/IEC 10746-1:1998, Information technology - open distributed processing - reference model: overview (ISO RM-ODP), ISO/IEC 10746-1:1998 (ISO standard, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Standards Organization(ISO): ISO/IEC12119:1994, Information technology- software packages - quality requirements and testing (ISO Standard 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Standards Organisation (ISO): ISO 14102:1995, Information technology, guideline for the evaluation and selection of CASE tools, JTC 1/SC 7 (ISO Standard 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. International Standards Organization (ISO): ISO/IEC 25000:2005, Software engineering - software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) (ISO Standard, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1999) ISBN 0-201-57169-2

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lundella, B., Lings, B.: Comments on ISO14102: the standard for CASE-tool evaluation. Comput. Standards Interf. 24(5), 381-382 (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. MetaCase Whitepaper: ABC to MetaCase Technoology. http://www.metacase.com/, © 2004 by MetaCase. Cited 26 Nov 2005

  25. Microsoft Corporation: Visual Studio 2005 Team System Modeling Strategy and Faq, In: MSDN Library. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/vstsmodel.asp. Cited16 Nov 2005

  26. MODELing Solutions for softWARE systems (MODELWARE), ESPRIT VI IST project no. 511731. http://www.modelware-ist.org. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  27. Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility 2.0 (MOF), Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Core Specification, OMG document ptc/03-10-04. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?ptc/03-10-04.pdf. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  28. Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility 2.0 XMI Mapping Specification, OMG document ptc/04-06-11. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?ptc/04-06-11.pdf . Cited 16 Nov 2005

  29. Object Management Group (OMG): MOF model to text transformation language request for proposal, OMG document: ad/2004-04-07. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/04-04-07. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  30. Object Management Group (OMG): MOF Query/Views/Transformations RFP, OMG document: ad/2002-04- 10. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/02-04-10. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  31. Object Management Group (OMG): OMG MDA Guide v1.0.1, OMG document omg/2003-06-01. http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  32. Object Management Group (OMG): MOF QVT Final Adopted Specification, OMG Adopted Specification, OMG document number ptc/05-11-01 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/05-11-01. Cited 9 April 2006

  33. Object Management Group (OMG): Unified Modeling Language 2.0 (UML 2.0), UML 2.0 infrastructure final adopted specification. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?ptc/03-09-15.pdf. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  34. Oldevik, J., Model transformation for system families prototype, FAMILIES consortium-wide deliverable, CWD4.3:2.3 version 1.0. http://www.esi.es/Families/. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  35. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software product line engineering - foundations, principles, and techniques (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005) ISBN 3-540-24372-0

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Solberg, A., Oldevik, J., Jensvoll, A.: A generic framework for defining domain-specific models. In: UML and the Unified Process, ed by Favre, L. (IRM, Hershey, 2003) pp 23-38

    Google Scholar 

  37. UML Model Transformation Tool (UMT). http://umt-qvt.sourceforge.net/. Cited 16 Nov 2005

  38. Xactium Limited: Language Driven Development and XMF-Mosaic, Whitepaper. http://www.xactium.com (2005). Cited 24 Nov 2005

  39. Ziadi, T., Hélouët, L., Jézéquel, J.M.: Towards a UML profile for software product lines. In: Software Product-Family Engineering, ed by van der Linden, F., 5th International Workshop, PFE 2003, Italy, Nov 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York 2003) pp 129-139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oldevik, J., Solberg, A., Haugen, Ø., Møller-Pedersen, B. (2006). Evaluation Framework for Model-Driven Product Line Engineering Tools. In: Käköla, T., Duenas, J.C. (eds) Software Product Lines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33252-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33253-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics