Skip to main content

Preventing Bluff Agent Invasions in Honest Societies

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2801))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Frequently debated issues in the domain of game theory involve the issue of signalling strategies used in order to resolve conflicts between agents over indivisible resources and to reduce the costly outcomes associated with fighting. Signalling behaviour, used by agents of different strengths, to aid resource acquisition was modelled using an artificial life simulation environment. Honest signalling and the bluff strategy based on Enquist/Hurd’s adapted pay-off matrix (1997) were evaluated relative to different proportions of resident strong agents capable of imposing a ‘punishment’ cost on bluffer agents. We found that in order for honest signalling to be immune to invasion by a bluff strategy, the number of punishment enforcers in the society must be high. Additionally, the number of punishment enforcers is more influential in preventing bluff agent invasions than the severity of punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, E.S., Mesterton-Gibbons, M.: The cost of threat displays and the stability of deceptive communication. Journal of theoretical biology 175, 405–421 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lachmann, M., Szamado, S., Bergstrom, C.T.: Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(23), 13189–13194 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. British Crime Survey, Criminal Statistics England and Wales, Payback-Crime and Punishment 05/03/03 (2000), http://www.payback.org.uk/candpkey-issues.html

  4. Canning, K., Maynard, S.: The Selfish Gene, vol. 130, pp. 75–76 (1978); cited in Dawkins, R. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caryl, P.G.: Acquisition of information in contests: The gulf between theory and biology. In: ESS Workshop on Animal Conflicts, Sheffield, UK (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enquist, M.: Communication during aggressive interaction with particular reference to variation in choice of behaviour. Animal Behaviour 33, 1152–1161 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Enquist, M., Hurd, P.L.: Conventional Signalling in Aggressive Interactions: the Importance of Temporal Structure. Journal of Theoretical Biology 192, 197–211 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gale, J.S., Revd Eaves, L.J.: The Selfish Gene, vol. 283 (1975); cited in Dawkins, R. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grafen, A.: Biological Signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144, 517–546 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurd, P.L.: Is Signalling of Fighting Ability Costlier forWeaker Individuals? Journal of Theoretical Biology 184, 83–88 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnstone, R.A.: Game Theory and communication. In: Game Theory and Animal Behaviour, pp. 94–117. Oxford University Press, NewYork (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lachmann, M., Bergstrom, C.T., Szamado, S.: The death of costly signalling? 27/02/03 (2000), http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/signalling/death.html

  13. Maynard Smith and Price, (1982) The Selfish Gene, 69–79 (1973); cited in Dawkins, R. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noble, J.: Talk is cheap: Evolved strategies for communication and action in asymmetrical animal contests. In: Meyer, J.-A., Berthoz, A., Floreano, D., Roitblat, H., Wilson, S. (eds.) SAB 2000, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 481–490. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zahavi, A.: Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205–214 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Youth Survey, Summary of the MORI 2002 Youth Survey 05/03/03 (2002), http://www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk/policy/Moriexcsummary.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lowe, R., Polani, D. (2003). Preventing Bluff Agent Invasions in Honest Societies. In: Banzhaf, W., Ziegler, J., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20057-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39432-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics