Skip to main content

Why Synonymy Is Rare: Fitness Is in the Speaker

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2801))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Pure synonymy is rare. By contrast, homonymy is common in languages. Human avoidance of synonymy is plausibly innate, as theorists of differing persuasions have claimed. Innate dispositions to synonymy and homonymy are modelled here, in relation to alternative roles of speaking and hearing in determining fitness.

In the computer model, linguistic signs are acquired via different genetically determined strategies, variously (in)tolerant to synonymy or homonymy. The model defines communicative success as the probability of a speaker getting a message across to a hearer; interpretive success is the probability of a hearer correctly interpreting a speaker’s signal. Communicative and interpretive success are compared as bases for reproductive fitness. When communicative success is the basis for fitness, a genotype evolves which is averse to synonymy, while tolerating homonymy. Conversely, when interpretive success is the basis for fitness, a genotype evolves which is averse to homonymy, while tolerating synonymy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackley, D., Littman, M.: Altruism in the Evolution of Communication. Artificial Life 4, 40–48 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, E.V.: On the Pragmatics of Contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–431 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurford, J.R.: Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device. Lingua 77, 187–222 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirby, S.: Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Journal of Evolutionary Computation 5(2), 102–110 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirby, S., Hurford, J.R.: Learning, culture and evolution in the origin of linguistic constraints. In: Husbands, P., Harvey, I. (eds.) Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirby, S., Hurford, J.R.: The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An overview of the Iterated Learning Model. In: Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D. (eds.) Simulating the Evolution of Language. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Markman, E.M.: Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989) [esp. Chs 8 & 9]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oliphant, M., Batali, J.: Learning and the Emergence of Coordinated Communication. Center for Research on Language Newsletter, 11(1). University of California, San Diego (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinker, S.: Language Learnability and Language Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, K.: The Importance of Rapid Cultural Convergence in the Evolution of Learned Symbolic Communication. In: Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 637–640 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, K.: The Cultural Evolution of Communication in a Population of Neural Networks. Connection Science 14(1), 65–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, K.: The Transmission of Language: models of biological and cultural evolution, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steels, L.: The Talking Heads Experiment. Words and Meanings, vol. 1. Laboratorium, Antwerpen (1999) (special pre-edition)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steels, L., Kaplan, F., McIntyre, A., van Looveren, J.: Crucial Factors in the Origins of Word-Meaning. In: Wray, A. (ed.) The Transition to Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Werner, G., Dyer, M.: Evolution of Communication in Artificial Organisms. Artificial Life 2, 659–687 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wexler, P., Culicover, P.: Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hurford, J.R. (2003). Why Synonymy Is Rare: Fitness Is in the Speaker. In: Banzhaf, W., Ziegler, J., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20057-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39432-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics