Abstract
With the electronic signature law and related laws now being put into effect, evidence-making based on digital signatures is about to come into widespread use in society. Methods for making digital evidence have not been established, however, for several important areas such as long-term maintenance of digital evidence. The authors believe that evidence can be basically classified into that which is legally authorized and that which is not, and that making a clear distinction between them will help to accelerate research and development of digital evidence-making systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Matsumoto, T., Iwamura, M., Sasaki, R., Matsuki, T.: Alibi Establishment for Electronic Signature: How to Prove that You Did Not Make the Electronic Signature in Question Even When the Base Crypotsystem Was Collapsed, IPSJ-CSEC (August 2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yoshiura, H., Miyazaki, K., Itoh, S., Takaragi, K., Sasaki, R. (2004). Legally Authorized and Unauthorized Digital Evidence. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J.A., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2845. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39871-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39871-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20830-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39871-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive