Skip to main content

A Calculus for Set-Based Program Development

  • Conference paper
Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2885))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose an algebraic calculus for set-based program development. First, we reconstruct a fragment of set theory via atomic distributive lattices (ADL). Semantically, ADL extends boolean reasoning about sets by element-wise reasoning; it avoids presupposing a universal set. Operationally, ADL yields abstract, concise, elegant proofs from few elementary principles. Second, we develop a focused automated proof-search procedure for ADL with simple deduction and powerful reduction and simplification rules. Proof-search is guided by rewriting techniques. The procedure decides several subclasses. Main application is the proof-support for formal methods like B or Z.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrial, J.-R.: The B-Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Rewrite-based equational theorem proving with selection and simplification. J. Logic and Computation 4(3), 217–247 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Rewrite techniques for transitive relations. In: Ninth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 384–393. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory. Colloquium Publications, vol. 25. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1984) (reprint)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dilworth, R.P.: Lattices with unique complements. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 57, 123–154 (1945)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Doornbos, H., Backhouse, R.C., van der Woude, J.: A calculation approach to mathematical induction. Theoretical Computer Science 179, 103–135 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon, M.: Set theory, higher-order logic or both? In: von Wright, J., Harrison, J., Grundy, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125, pp. 191–202. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grzegorczyk, A.: Undecidability of some topological theories. Fund. Math. 38, 137–152 (1951)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hermes, H.: Einführung in die Verbandstheorie. Springer, Heidelberg (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hines, L.: Str+ .ve⊆: The Str+ .ve-based Subset Prover. In: Stickel, M.E. (ed.) CADE 1990. LNCS, vol. 449, pp. 193–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoare, C.A.R., von Karger, B.: Sequential calculus. Information Processing Letters 53(3), 123–130 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozen, D.: Complexity of Boolean algebras. Theoretical Computer Science 10, 221–247 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozen, D.: Kleene algebra with tests. Transation on Programming Languages and Systems 19(3), 427–443 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paulson, L.C.: Set theory for verification: I. From foundations to functions. J. Automated Reasoning 11, 353–389 (1993)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Quaife, A.: Automated deduction in von-Neumann-Bernays-Gödel set theory. J. Automated Deduction 8, 91–147 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rudnicki, P.: An overwiev of the MIZAR project. Technical report, Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spivey, J.M.: Understanding Z. Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Struth, G.: An algebra of resolution. In: Bachmair, L. (ed.) RTA 2000. LNCS, vol. 1833, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Struth, G.: Deriving focused calculi for transitive relations. In: Middeldorp, A. (ed.) RTA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2051, pp. 291–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Struth, G.: Deriving focused lattice calculi. In: Tison, S. (ed.) RTA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2378, pp. 83–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Struth, G.: A calculus for set-based program development I: Mathematical foundations. Technical Report 2003-15, Institut für Informatik; Universität Augsburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Struth, G.: A calculus for set-based program development II: Proof search. Technical Report 2003-16, Institut für Informatik; Universität Augsburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tarski, A.: Arithmetical classes and types of Boolean algebras. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 55(64), 1192 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tseitin, G.S.: On the complexity of derivations in propositional calculus. In: Siekmann, J., Wrightson, G. (eds.) Automation of Reasoning: Classical Papers on Computational Logic, pp. 466–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1983) (reprint)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Struth, G. (2003). A Calculus for Set-Based Program Development. In: Dong, J.S., Woodcock, J. (eds) Formal Methods and Software Engineering. ICFEM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2885. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39893-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39893-6_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39893-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics