Skip to main content

Analysing Mailboxes of Asynchronous Communicating Components

  • Conference paper
On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (OTM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2888))

Abstract

Asynchronous communications are prominent in distributed and mobile systems. Often concurrent systems consider an abstract point of view with synchronous communications. However it seems more realistic and finer to consider asynchronous communicating systems, since it provides a more primitive communication protocol and maximize the concurrency. Several languages and models have been defined using this communication mode: agent, actor, mobile computation, and so on. Here we reconsider a previous component model with full data types and synchronous communications with an asynchronous flavour. The dynamic behaviour of a component is represented as a structured symbolic transition system with mailboxes. We also present an algorithm devoted to an analysis of the dynamic behaviour of the system. This algorithm decides if the system has bound mailboxes and computes the reachable mailbox contents of the system. The component model and the algorithm are illustrated on a flight system reservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ProActive, http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/ProActive/

  2. Achermann, F., Nierstrasz, O.: Applications = Components + Scripts – A Tour of Piccola. In: Aksit, M. (ed.) Software Architectures and Component Technology, pp. 261–292. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agha, G.: Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming. Communication of the ACM 33(9), 125–141 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agha, G., Hewitt, C.: Concurrent programming using actors: Exploiting large-scale parallelism. In: Maheshwari, S.N. (ed.) FSTTCS 1985. LNCS, vol. 206, pp. 19–40. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allemand, M., Royer, J.-C.: Mixed Formal Specification with PVS. In: Proceedings of the 15th IPDPS 2002 Symposium, FMPPTA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen, R., Douence, R., Garlan, D.: Specifying and Analyzing Dynamic Software Architectures. In: Astesiano, E. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FASE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1382, pp. 21–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, R., Garlan, D.: A formal basis for architectural connection. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6(3), 213–249 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold, A.: Finite Transition Systems. International Series in Computer Science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994) ISBN 0-13-092990-5

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Caromel, D.: Object Based Concurrency: Ten Language Features to Achieve Reuse. In: Workshop on Object Based Concurrency and Reuse, Utrecht, the Netherlands, June 1992, ECOOP 1992 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caromel, D.: Toward a method of object-oriented concurrent programming. Communications of the ACM 36(9), 90–102 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choppy, C., Poizat, P., Royer, J.-C.: Formal Specification of Mixed Components with Korrigan. In: Proceedings of the 8th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC 2001, pp. 169–176. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Choppy, C., Poizat, P., Royer, J.-C.: Specification of Mixed Systems in KORRIGAN with the Support of a UML-Inspired Graphical Notation. In: Hussmann, H. (ed.) FASE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2029, pp. 124–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Verification tools for finite-state concurrent systems. In: van Katwijk, J. (ed.) Ada-Europe 1992. LNCS, vol. 603, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denker, G., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.L.: Protocol specification and analysis in Maude. In: Heintze, N., Wing, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on Formal Methods and Security Protocols, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 25 (1998), http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/who/nch/fmsp/index.html

  15. Emmerich, W.: Distributed component technologies and their software engineering implications. In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Software Engeneering (ICSE 2002), pp. 537–546. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Emmerich, W., Kaveh, N.: F2: Component technologies: Java beans, COM, CORBA, RMI, EJB and the CORBA component model. In: Gruhn, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the Joint 8th European Software Engeneering Conference and 9th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundation of Software Engeneering (ESEC/FSE 2001). SOFTWARE ENGINEERING NOTES, vol. 26(5), pp. 311–312. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formulation for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8(3), 231–274 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Honda, K., Tokoro, M.: An object calculus for synchronous communication. In: America, P. (ed.) ECOOP 1991. LNCS, vol. 512, pp. 133–147. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Inverardi, P., Wolf, A.L., Yankelevich, D.: Static checking of system behaviors using derived component assumptions. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 9(3), 239–272 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/IEC. LOTOS: A Formal Description Technique based on the Temporal Ordering of Observational Behaviour. ISO/IEC 8807, International Organization for Standardization (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson, M., Zave, P.: Distributed feature composition: A virtual architecture for telecommunications services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(10), 831–847 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaveh, N., Emmerich, W.: Deadlock detection in distributed object systems. In: Gruhn, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the Joint 8th European Software Engeneering Conference and 9th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundation of Software Engeneering (ESEC/FSE 2001), September 10-14. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING NOTES, vol. 26(5), pp. 44–51. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lamport, L., Lynch, N.: Distributed Computing: Models and Methods, pp. 1156–1199. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lutz, M.: Programming Python. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1), 70–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis, and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. OMG. CORBA Component Model Specification, v3.0. Technical report, Object Management Group (2002), www.omg.org/technology/documents/

  28. Peng, L., Romanczuk, A., Royer, J.-C.: A Translation of UML Components into Formal Specifications. In: D’Hondt, T. (ed.) TOOLS East Europe 2002, pp. 60–75. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003) ISBN: 1-4020-7428-X

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rajamani, S.K., Rehof, J.: Conformance checking for models of asynchronous message passing software. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 166–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Royer, J.-C.: Formal Specification and Temporal Proof Techniques for Mixed Systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th IPDPS 2001 Symposium, FMPPTA, San Francisco, USA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Royer, J.-C.: The GAT Approach to Specify Mixed Systems. Informatica 27(1), 89–103 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Royer, J.-C., Xu, M.: Analysing Mailboxes of Asynchronous Communicating Components. Technical Report 03-09, Ecoles des Mines de Nantes (2003), http://www.emn.fr/x-info/jroyer

  33. Thorn, T.: Programming languages for mobile code. ACM Computing Surveys 29(3), 213–239 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wooldridge, M., Ciancarini, P.: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering: The State of the Art. In: Ciancarini, P., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) AOSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1957, pp. 1–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Zave, P., Jackson, M.: A component-based approach to telecommunication software. IEEE Software 15(5), 70–78 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Royer, JC., Xu, M. (2003). Analysing Mailboxes of Asynchronous Communicating Components. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds) On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2888. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_89

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20498-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39964-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics