Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 219))

Abstract

This paper introduces a mathematical model of a hint as a body of imprecise and uncertain information. Hints are used to judge hypotheses: the degree to which a hint supports a hypothesis and the degree to which a hypothesis appears as plausible in the light of a hint are defined. This leads in turn to support- and plausibility functions. Those functions are characterized as set functions which are normalized and monotone or alternating of order ∞. This relates the present work to G. Shafer’s mathematical theory of evidence. However, whereas Shafer starts out with an axiomatic definition of belief functions, the notion of a hint is considered here as the basic element of the theory. It is shown that a hint contains more information than is conveyed by its support function alone. Also hints allow for a straightforward and logical derivation of Dempster’s rule for combining independent and dependent bodies of information. This paper presents the mathematical theory of evidence for general, infinite frames of discernment from the point of view of a theory of hints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choquet G. (1953): Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 5, 131–295.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Choquet G. (1969): Lectures on analysis. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dempster A.P. (1967): Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 325–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois D., and Prade H. (1986): A Set-Theoretic View of Belief Functions. Logical Operations and Approximations by Fuzzy Sets. Int. J. General Systems, 12, 193–226

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin R., and Halpern J.Y. (1989): Uncertainty, Belief, and Probability. IJCAI-89, 1161–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman I.R., and Nguyen H.T. (1985): Uncertainty Models for Knowledge-Based Systems. North Holland, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohlas J. (1990): A Mathematical Theory of Hints. Working Paper, Institute for Automation and Operations Research, University of Fribourg (Switzerland), No. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neveu J. (1964): Bases mathématiques du calcul des probabilités. Masson, Paris.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen H.T. (1978): On Random Sets and Belief Functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 65, 531–542.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruspini E.H. (1987): Epistemic Logics, Probability, and the Calculus of Evidence. IJCAI-87, 924–931.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shafer G. (1976): A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shafer G. (1978): Dempster’s rule of combination. Unpublished Manuscript. The University of Kansas, School of Business, 202 Summerfield, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer G. (1979): Allocations of probability. The Annals of Probability, 7, 827–839.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafer G. (1990): Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Belief Functions. Int. J. Approx. Reas., 4, 323–362.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Strat T. (1984): Continuous Belief Functions for Evidential Reasoning. AAAI-84, 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yager R.R. (1985): The entailment principle for Dempster-Shafer granule. Tech. Report MII-512, Iona college, New Rochelle, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kohlas, J., Monney, PA. (2008). Representation of Evidence by Hints. In: Yager, R.R., Liu, L. (eds) Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25381-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44792-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics