Skip to main content

Using Formal Concept Analysis for Semantic Web Applications

  • Chapter
Contributions to Ubiquitous Computing

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 42))

  • 433 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberink M, Rutledge L, Veenstra M(2003) Clustering Semantics for Discourse Generation. In: Proc1st Int Workshop on Hypermedia and the Semantic Web http://homepages.cwi.nl/media/publications/ htsw2003topia.pdf

  2. Anjewierden A, de Hoog R, Brussee R, Efimova L (2005) Detecting Knowledge Flows in Weblogs. In: Dau F, Mugnier M-L, Stumme G (eds) Proc 13th Int Conf on Conceptual Structures, Kassel University Press, pp 1-12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader F, Horrocks I, Sattler U (2005) Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web. In: Hutter D, Stephan W (eds) LNAI 2605, Springer, pp 228-248

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barwise J, Seligman J (1997) Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 44, Cambridge Univer-sity Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bashir FI, Mansoor H (2003) Ontology Construction for Structured Textual Data. http://multimedia.ece.uic.edu/faisal/downloads/research/ cs580-proj6.pdf

  6. Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M (1999) Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. Harper

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5): 35-43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruno M, Canfora G, Di Penta M, Scognamiglio R (2005) An Approach to Support Web Service Classification and Annotation. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, pp 138-143

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cigarr án JM, Gonzalo J, Pen˜as A, Verdejo F (2004): Browsing Search Results via Formal Concept Analysis: Automatic Selection of Attributes. In: Proc 2nd Int Conf on Formal Concept Analysis, pp 74-87

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cimiano P, Hotho A, Stumme G, Tane J (2004) Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies. In: Eklund P (ed) LNAI 2961, Springer, pp 189-207

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cole R, Eklund P, Stumme G (2000) CEM — a Conceptual Email Manager. In: Ganter B, Mineau GW (eds) LNAI 1867, Springer, pp 438-452

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compton P, Jansen R (1990) A Philosophical Basis for Knowledge Acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 2 (3): 242-257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Concept Explorer (2003) Free software. http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/conexp

  14. Corbett D (2003) Comparing and Merging Ontologies: a Concept Type Hierarchy Approach. In: Zhong N et al (eds) LNAI 2871, Springer, pp 75-82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dean M, Connolly D et al (eds) (2002) OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Refer-ence. W3C Working Draft 29. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  16. Delteil A, Faron C, Dieng R (2002) Building Concept Lattices by Learning Con-cepts from RDF Graphs Annotating Web Documents. In: Priss U, Corbett D, An-gelova G (eds) LNAI 2393, Springer, pp 191-204

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Souza K, Davis J (2004) Aligning Ontologies and Evaluating Concept Simi-larities. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds) LNCS 3291, Springer, pp 1012-1029

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doan A, Madhavan J, Domingos P, Halevy A (2002) Learning to Map Be-tween Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: Proc 11th Int WWW Conf. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/doan02learning.html

  19. Farquhar A, Fikes R, Pratt W, Rice J(1996) Collaborative Ontology Construction for Information Integration. Stanford University WWW Archive.http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/

  20. Fensel D (2000) The Semantic Web and its Languages. IEEE Intelligent Systems 15(6): 67-73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fonseca F (2001) Ontology-driven Geographic Information Systems. PhD thesis, University of Maine

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ganter B (1996) Attribute Exploration with Background Knowledge. In: Proc Conf on Order and Decision Making. http://citeseer.ifi.unizh.ch/ganter96attribute.html

  23. Ganter B, Stumme G (2003) Creation and Merging of Ontology Top-levels. In: de Moor A, Lex W, Ganter B (eds) LNAI 2746, Springer, pp 131-145

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gauch S, Chaffee J, Pretschner A (2004) Ontology-Based User Profiles for Search and Browsing. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 1 (3/4): 219-234

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gauch S, Pretschner A (1999) Ontology Based Personalized Search. In: Proc 11th IEEE Int Conf on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Chicago, pp 391-398

    Google Scholar 

  26. El Gohary N, El Diraby T (2005) Achieving Ontology Interoperability us-ing Formal Concept Analysis: an Approach to Inter-organizational Collaboration. In: Proc22nd CIB-W78Conf on Information Technology in Construction,Dresden.http://itc.scix.net/data/works/att/w78- 2005-D5- 2-El-Gohary.pdf

  27. Gruber TR (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition 5 (2): 199-220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gu T (2003) Using Formal Concept Analysis for Ontology Structuring and Building. http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home5/pg04247176/Using FCA for ontology building and structuring.pdf

  29. Haav HM (2003) An Application of Inductive Concept Analysis to Con-struction of Domain-specific Ontologies. In: Proc 29th Int Conf on Very Large Databases. http://dbis-conference.informatik.tu-cottbus de/vldb2003/h haav.pdf.

  30. Heflin J (2004) Web Ontology Language (OWL) Use Cases and Requirements. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webont-req-20040210/

  31. Heflin J, Hendler J (2000) Searching the Web with SHOE. In: Artificial Intelligence for Web Search, AAAI Press, pp 35-40

    Google Scholar 

  32. IEEE Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (2006) http://suo.ieee org/IFF/.

  33. Kalfoglou Y, Schorlemmer M (2003) IF-Map: An Ontology-Mapping Method based on Information-Flow Theory. Journal of Data Semantics 1 (1): 98-127

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kent RE (2003) Semantic Integration in the IFF. http://www.ontologos org/Papers/SI2003/SI2003.pdf.

  35. Kim M, Compton P (2001) Formal Concept Analysis for Domain-Specific Docu-ment Retrieval Systems. In: Stumptner M, Corbett D, Brooks M (eds) Proc 14th Int Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, pp 237-248

    Google Scholar 

  36. Le Grand B, Soto M, Dodds D (2001) XML Topic Maps and Semantic Web Mining. In: Proc Workshop Semantic Web Mining at ECML/PKDD-2001. http://semwebmine2001.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/online/ semwebmine08.pdf

  37. Madrid JM, Gauch S (2002) Incorporating Conceptual Matching in Search. In: Proc 11th Conf on Information and Knowledge Management. http://hagrid.icesi.edu.co/jmadrid/docs/KeyConcept-CIKM02.pdf

  38. Neumann G, Backofen R, Baur J, Becker M, Braun C (1997) An Information Ex-traction Core System for Real World German Text Processing. In: Proc 5th Conf on Applied Natural Language Processing, Washington, DC, pp 209-216

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oosthuizen GD (1993) Rough Sets and Concept Lattices. In: Proc Int Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Banff, pp 24-31

    Google Scholar 

  40. Papazoglou MP, Kr ämer BJ, Yang J (2003) Leveraging Web-Services and Peer-to-Peer Networks. In: Eder J, Missikoff M (eds) LNCS 2681, Springer, pp 485-501

    Google Scholar 

  41. Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory (1998) http://wordnet. princeton.edu/

  42. Priss U (2006) Formal Concept Analysis in Information Science. In: Cronin B (ed) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 40, pp 521-543

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quan TT, Hui SC, Cao TH (2004) FOGA: a Fuzzy Ontology Generation Frame-work for Scholarly Semantic Web. In: Proc Knowledge Discovery and Ontologies Workshop. http://olp.dfki.de/pkdd04/quan-final.pdf

  44. Rutledge L, van Ossenbruggen J, Hardman L (2005) Making RDF Presentable: Integrated Global and Local Semantic Web Browsing. In: Proc WWW2005, Chiba pp 199-206

    Google Scholar 

  45. Safar B, Kefi H, Reynaud C (2004) OntoRefiner: a User Query Refinement Inter-face Usable for Semantic Web Portals. In: Proc European Conf on Artificial Intel-ligence Workshop on Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Web Com-munities. http://www.lri.fr/kefi/articles/ECAI’ 04.pdf

  46. Sowa JF (1984) Conceptual Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley 47. Stanford Medical Informatics (2005) Protege Ontology Editor. http://protege.stanford.edu/

  47. Stumme G, Maedche A (2001) FCA-Merge: Bottom-up Merging of Ontologies. In: Proc 17th Int Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, pp 225-230

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stumme G, Taouil R, Bastide Y, Pasqier N, Lakhal L (2002) Computing Iceberg Concept Lattices with Titanic. J on Knowledge and Data Engineering 42 (2): 189-222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Szathmaty L, Napoli A (2004) Knowledge Organisation and Information Re-trieval using Galois Lattices. In: Proc Modeling, Computation and Optimization in Information Systems and Management Sciences, Hermes Science Publishing, pp 611-618

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tane J, Schmitz C, Stumme G (2004) Semantic Resource Management for the Web: an E-Learning Application. In: Proc 13th World Wide Web Conference, New York. http://www2004.org/proceedings/docs/2p1.pdf

  51. Tepfenhart WM (1998) Ontologies and Conceptual Structures. In: LNCS 1453, Springer, pp 334-350

    Google Scholar 

  52. TopicMaps.Org XTM Authoring Group (2001) XTM: XML Topic Maps 1.0: Top-icMaps.Org Specification

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wille R (1982) Restructuring Lattice Theory: an Approach based on Hierarchies of Concepts. In: Rival I (ed) Ordered Sets, pp 445-470

    Google Scholar 

  54. World Wide Web Consortium(1999) RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/

  55. World Wide Web Consortium (2000) RDFS. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema- 20000327/

  56. World Wide Web Consortium (2004) Web Ontology Language (OWL). http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL

  57. Web Service Description Language (2001). http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

  58. Zhao Y, Halang WA, Wang X (2006) Rough Ontology Mapping in E-Business Integration. In: Lu J, Ruan D, Zhang GQ (eds) E-Service Intelligence — Method-ologies, Technologies and Applications. Springer book series on Computational Intelligence

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou BY, Hui SC, Fong CM (2005) Web Usage Mining for Semantic Web Person-alization. In: Proc Workshop on Personalization on the Semantic Web, pp 66-72. http://www.win.tue.nl/persweb/Camera-ready/9-Zhou-full.pdf

  60. Zhu X, Gauch S, Gerhard L, Kral N, Pretschner A (1999) Ontology-based Web Site Mapping for Information Exploration. In: Proc 8th Int Conf on Information Knowledge Management, pp 188-194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhao, Y. (2007). Using Formal Concept Analysis for Semantic Web Applications. In: Krämer, B.J., Halang, W.A. (eds) Contributions to Ubiquitous Computing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 42. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44910-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44910-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44909-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44910-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics