Skip to main content

Association Rule Interestingness Measures: Experimental and Theoretical Studies

  • Chapter
Quality Measures in Data Mining

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 43))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Abe, S. Tsumoto, M. Ohsaki, and T. Yamaguchi. Evaluating model construction methods with objective rule evaluation indices to support human experts. In V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, A. Valls, and J. Domingo-Ferrer, editors, Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, volume 3885 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 93-104, Tarragona, Spain, 2006. Springer-Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A.N. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In P. Buneman and S. Jajodia, editors, ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 207-216, 1993.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. J. AzĆ© and Y. Kodratoff. Evaluation de la rĆ©sistance au bruit de quelques mesures dā€™extraction de rĆØgles dā€™assocation. In D. HĆ©rin and D.A. Zighed, editors, Extraction des connaissances et apprentissage, volume 1, pages 143-154. Hermes, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. J. AzƩ and Y. Kodratoff. A study of the effect of noisy data in rule extraction systems. In The Sixteenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, volume 2, pages 781-786, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. J. P. BarthƩlemy, A. Legrain, P. Lenca, and B. Vaillant. Aggregation of valued relations applied to association rule interestingness measures. In V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, A. Valls, and J. Domingo-Ferrer, editors, Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, volume 3885 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 203-214, Tarrogona, Spain, 2006. Springer-Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. R. J. Bayardo and R. Agrawal. Mining the most interesting rules. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 145-154, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. R. Bisdorff. Bipolar ranking from pairwise fuzzy outrankings. Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics and Computer Science, 37(4) :379-387, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. C.L. Blake and C.J. Merz. UCI repository of machine learning databases. http://www.ics.uci.edu/āˆ¼mlearn/MLRepository.html, 1998.

  9. J. Blanchard, F. Guillet, and H. Briand. A virtual reality environment for knowledge mining. In R. Bisdorff, editor, Human Centered Processes, pages 175-179, Luxembourg, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. J. Blanchard, F. Guillet, H. Briand, and R. Gras. Assessing the interestingness of rules with a probabilistic measure of deviation from equilibrium. In J. Janssen and P. Lenca, editors, The XIth International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, pages 191-200, Brest, France, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. J. Blanchard, F. Guillet, H. Briand, and R. Gras. IPEE : Indice probabiliste dā€™Ć©cart Ć  lā€™Ć©quilibre pour lā€™Ć©valuation de la qualitĆ© des rĆØgles. In Atelier QualitĆ© des DonnĆ©es et des Connaissances (EGC 2005), pages 26-34, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. J. Blanchard, F. Guillet, R. Gras, and H. Briand. Using information-theoretic measures to assess association rule interestingness. In The 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 66-73, Houston, Texas, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. C. Borgelt and R. Kruse. Induction of association rules: Apriori implementation. In Compstatā€™02, pages 395-400, Berlin, Germany, 2002. Physica Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal. promethee-gaia - Une mĆ©thode dā€™aide Ć  la dĆ©cision en prĆ©sence de critĆØres multiples. Ellipses, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. J.P. Brans and P. Vincke. A preference ranking organization method. Manage- ment Science, 31(6):647-656, 1985.

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. T. Brijs, K. Vanhoof, and G. Wets. Defining interestingness for association rules. International journal of information theories and applications, 10(4):370-376,2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. S. Brin, R. Motwani, and C. Silverstein. Beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations. In ACM SIGMOD/PODSā€™97 Joint Conference, pages 265-276, 1997.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. S. Brin, R. Motwani, J.D. Ullman, and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In J. Peckham, editor, ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 255-264, Tucson, Arizona, USA, 1997. ACM Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. J.-H. Chauchat and A. Risson. Visualization of Categorical Data, chapter 3, pages 37-45. Blasius J. & Greenacre M. ed., 1998. New York: Academic Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. K.W. Church and P. Hanks. Word association norms, mutual information an lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29, 1990.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. E. Cohen, M. Datar, S. Fujiwara, A. Gionis, P. Indyk, R. Motwani, J. Ullman, and C. Yang. Finding interesting associations without support pruning. In The 16th International conference on Data engineering, 2000.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. J. Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46, 1960.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. A.W.F. Edwards. The measure of association in a 2 x 2 table. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 126(1):109-114, 1963.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. U.M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, and R. Uthurusamy, editors. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI/MIT Press, 1996.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. D. Feno, J. Diatta, and A. Totohasina. NormalisĆ©e dā€™une mesure probabiliste de la qualitĆ© des rĆØgles dā€™association : Ć©tude de cas. In Atelier QualitĆ© des DonnĆ©es et des Connaissances (EGC 2006), pages 25-30, 2006.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. A. Freitas. On rule interestingness measures. Knowledge-Based Systems journal, pages 309-315, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. V. Giakoumakis and B. Monjardet. Coefficients dā€™accord entre deux prĆ©ordres totaux. Statistique et Analyse des DonnĆ©es, 12(1 et 2):46-99, 1987.

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. I.J. Good. The estimation of probabilities: An essay on modern bayesian methods. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965.

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. R. Gras, S. Ag. Almouloud, M. Bailleuil, A. Larher, M. Polo, H. Ratsimba-Rajohn, and A. Totohasina. Lā€™implication Statistique, Nouvelle MĆ©thode Exploratoire de DonnĆ©es. Application Ć  la Didactique, Travaux et ThĆØses. La PensĆ©e Sauvage, 1996.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  30. R. Gras, R. Couturier, J. Blanchard, H. Briand, P. Kuntz, and P. Peter. Quelques critĆØres pour une mesure de qualitĆ© de rĆØgles dā€™association - un exemple: lā€™intensitĆ© dā€™implication. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de lā€™Information (Mesures de QualitĆ© pour la Fouille de DonnĆ©es), (RNTI-E-1):3-31, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. R. Gras, P. Kuntz, R. Couturier, and F. Guillet. Une version entropique de lā€™intensitĆ© dā€™implication pour les corpus volumineux. In H. Briand and F. Guillet, editors, Extraction des connaissances et apprentissage, volume 1, pages 69-80. Hermes, 2001.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  32. S. Greco, Z. Pawlak, and R. Slowinski. Can bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17(4):345-361, 2004.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. S. Guillaume. Traitement des donnĆ©es volumineuses, Mesures et algorithmes dā€™extraction de rĆØgles dā€™association et rĆØgles ordinales. PhD thesis, UniversitĆ© de Nantes, 2000.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. F. Guillet. Mesures de la qualitƩ des connaissances en ECD. Atelier, Extraction et gestion des connaissances, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  35. P. Hajek, I. Havel, and M. Chytil. The guha method of automatic hypotheses determination. Computing, (1):293-308, 1966.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  36. R.J. Hilderman and H.J. Hamilton. Applying objective interestingness measures in data mining systems. In Fourth European Symposium on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 432-439. Springer Verlag, 2000.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  37. R.J. Hilderman and H.J. Hamilton. Evaluation of interestingness measures for ranking discovered knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2035:247-259,2001.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  38. R.J. Hilderman and H.J. Hamilton. Knowledge Discovery and Measures of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  39. R.J. Hilderman and H.J. Hamilton. Measuring the interestingness of discovered knowledge: A principled approach. Intelligent Data Analysis, 7(4):347-382,2003.

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  40. Y. Huang, H. Xiong, S. Shekhar, and J. Pei. Mining confident co-location rules without a support threshold. In The 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  41. F. Hussain, H. Liu, E. Suzuki, and H. Lu. Exception rule mining with a relative interestingness measure. In T. Terano, H. Liu, and A.L.P. Chen, editors, The Fourth Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, volume 1805 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 86-97. SpringerVerlag, 2000.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  42. X-H. Huynh, F. Guillet, and H. Briand. ARQAT: An exploratory analysis tool for interestingness measures. In J. Janssen and P. Lenca, editors, The XIth International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, pages 334-344, Brest, France, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  43. A. Iodice Dā€™Enza, F. Palumbo, and M. Greenacre. Exploratory data analysis leading towards the most interesting binary association rules. In J. Janssen and P. Lenca, editors, The XIth International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, pages 256-265, Brest, France, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  44. S. Jaroszewicz and D.A. Simovici. A general measure of rule interestingness. In The 5th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 253-265, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  45. H.J. Jeffreys. Some tests of significance treated by the theory of probability. In Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, number 31, pages 203-222, 1935.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  46. M. Kamber and R. Shingal. Evaluating the interestingness of characteristic rules. In The Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 263-266, Portland, Oregon, August 1996.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  47. D. A. Keim. Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Transactions On Visualization And Computer Graphics, 7(1):100-107, 2002.

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  48. M. Klemettinen, H. Mannila, P. Ronkainen, H. Toivonen, and A.I. Verkamo. Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules. In N.R. Adam, B.K. Bhargava, and Y. Yesha, editors, Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 401-407. ACM Press, 1994.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  49. S. Lallich. Mesure et validation en extraction des connaissances Ơ partir des donnƩes. Habilitation Ơ Diriger des Recherches - UniversitƩ Lyon 2, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  50. S. Lallich, E. Prudhomme, and O. Teytaud. ContrĆ“le du risque multiple en sĆ©lection de rĆØgles dā€™association significatives. In G. HĆ©brail, L. Lebart, and J.-M. Petit, editors, Extraction et gestion des connaissances, volume 1-2, pages 305-316. CĆ©paduĆØs Editions, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  51. S. Lallich and O. Teytaud. Ɖ valuation et validation de lā€™intĆ©rĆŖt des rĆØgles dā€™association. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de lā€™Information (Mesures de QualitĆ© pour la Fouille de DonnĆ©es), (RNTI-E-1):193-217, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  52. S. Lallich, B. Vaillant, and P. Lenca. Parametrised measures for the evaluation of association rule interestingness. In J. Janssen and P. Lenca, editors, The XIth International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, pages 220-229, Brest, France, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  53. N. Lavrac, P. Flach, and B. Zupan. Rule evaluation measures: A unifying view. In S. Dzeroski and P. Flach, editors, Ninth International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, volume 1634 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 174-185. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  54. E. Le Saux, P. Lenca, J-P. BarthƩlemy, and P. Picouet. Updating a rule basis under cognitive constraints: the COMAPS tool. In The Seventeenth European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, pages 3-9, December 1998.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  55. E. Le Saux, P. Lenca, and P. Picouet. Dynamic adaptation of rules bases under cognitive constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(2):299-309,2002.

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  56. R. Lehn, F. Guillet, P. Kuntz, H. Briand, and J. PhilippƩ. Felix: An interactive rule mining interface in a KDD process. In P. Lenca, editor, Human Centered Processes, pages 169-174, Brest, France, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  57. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, P. Picouet, B. Vaillant, and S. Lallich. CritĆØres dā€™Ć©valuation des mesures de qualitĆ© en ecd. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de lā€™Information (Entreposage et Fouille de DonnĆ©es), (1):123-134, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  58. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, and S. Lallich. A multicriteria decision aid for interestingness measure selection. Technical Report LUSSI-TR-2004-01-EN, DĆ©partement LUSSI, ENST Bretagne, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  59. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, and P. Picouet. Aide multicritĆØre Ć  la dĆ©cision pour Ć©valuer les indices de qualitĆ© des connaissances - modĆ©lisation des prĆ©fĆ©rences de lā€™utilisateur. In M.-S. Hacid, Y. Kodratoff, and D. Boulanger, editors, Extraction et gestion des connaissances, volume 17 of RSTI-RIA, pages 271-282. Lavoisier, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  60. P. Lenca, P. Meyer, B. Vaillant, P. Picouet, and S. Lallich. Ɖvaluation et analyse multicritĆØre des mesures de qualitĆ© des rĆØgles dā€™association. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de lā€™Information (Mesures de QualitĆ© pour la Fouille de DonnĆ©es), (RNTI-E-1):219-246, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  61. P. Lenca, B. Vaillant, and S. Lallich. On the robustness of association rules. In IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, Bangkok, Thailand, 2006.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  62. I.C. Lerman. Classification et analyse ordinale des donnƩes. Dunod, 1970.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  63. I.C. Lerman and J. AzĆ©. Une mesure probabiliste contextuelle discriminante de qualitĆ© des rĆØgles dā€™association. In M.-S. Hacid, Y. Kodratoff, and D. Boulanger, editors, Extraction et gestion des connaissances, volume 17 of RSTI-RIA, pages 247-262. Lavoisier, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  64. I.C. Lerman, R. Gras, and H. Rostam. Elaboration dā€™un indice dā€™implication pour les donnĆ©es binaires, i et ii. MathĆ©matiques et Sciences Humaines, (74, 75):5-35, 5-47, 1981.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  65. B. Liu, W. Hsu, and S. Chen. Using general impressions to analyze discovered classification rules. In Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 31-36, 1997.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  66. B. Liu, W. Hsu, S. Chen, and Y. Ma. Analyzing the subjective interestingness of association rules. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(5):47-55, 2000.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  67. B. Liu, W. Hsu, K. Wang, and S. Chen. Visually aided exploration of interesting association rules. In Third Pacific-Asia Conference on Methodologies for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 380-389. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  68. J. Loevinger. A systemic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychological monographs, 61(4), 1947.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  69. J.-L. Marichal, P. Meyer, and M. Roubens. Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: The tomaso method. Computers & Operations Research, (32):861-877, 2005.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  70. K. McGarry. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowledge Engineering Review Journal, 20(1):39-61, 2005.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  71. M. Ohsaki, Y. Sato, S. Kitaguchi, H. Yokoi, and T. Yamaguchi. Comparison between objective interestingness measures and real human interest in medical data mining. In R. Orchard, C. Yang, and M. Ali, editors, The 17th international conference on Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence, volume 3029 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1072-1081. Springer-Verlag, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  72. B. Padmanabhan. The interestingness paradox in pattern discovery. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(8):1019-1035, 2004.

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  73. N. Pasquier, Y. Bastide, R. Taouil, and L. Lakhal. Discovering frequent closed itemsets for association rules. In C. Beeri and P. Buneman, editors, The 7th International Conference on Database Theory, volume 1540 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 398-416, Jerusalem, Israel, 1999. Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  74. K. Pearson. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. iii. regression, heredity and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 1896.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  75. G. Piatetsky-Shapiro. Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. In G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and W.J. Frawley, editors, Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 229-248. AAAI/MIT Press, 1991.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  76. P. Picouet and P. Lenca. Bases de donnƩes et internet, chapter Extraction de connaissances Ơ partir des donnƩes, pages 395-420. Hermes Science, 2001.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  77. M. Plasse, N. Niang, G. Saporta, and L. Leblond. Une comparaison de certains indices de pertinence des rĆØgles dā€™association. In G. Ritschard and C. Djeraba, editors, Extraction et gestion des connaissances, volume 1-2, pages 561-568. CĆ©paduĆØs- Ɖditions, 2006.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  78. F. Poulet. Visualization in data-mining and knowledge discovery. In P. Lenca, editor, Human Centered Processes, pages 183-191, Brest, France, 1999.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  79. F. Poulet. Towards visual data mining. In 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pages 349-356, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  80. J. Rauch and M. Simunek. Mining for 4ft association rules by 4ft-miner. In Proceeding of the International Conference On Applications of Prolog, pages 285-294, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  81. M. Sebag and M. Schoenauer. Generation of rules with certainty and confidence factors from incomplete and incoherent learning bases. In J. Boose, B. Gaines, and M. Linster, editors, The European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pages 28-1-28-20. Gesellschaft fĆ¼r Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung mbH, 1988.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  82. A. Silberschatz and A. Tuzhilin. On subjective measures of interestingness in knowledge discovery. In Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 275-281, 1995.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  83. A. Silberschatz and A. Tuzhilin. User-assisted knowledge discovery: How much should the user be involved. In ACM-SIGMOD Workshop on Research Issues on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1996.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  84. S.J. Simoff. Towards the development of environments for designing visualisation support for visual data mining. In S.J. Simoff, M. Noirhomme-Fraiture, and M.H. Bƶhlen, editors, International Workshop on Visual Data Mining in cunjunction with ECML/PKDDā€™01, pages 93-106, 2001.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  85. E. Suzuki. In pursuit of interesting patterns with undirected discovery of ex- ception rules. In S. Arikawa and A. Shinohara, editors, Progresses in Discovery Science, volume 2281 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 504-517. Springer-Verlag, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  86. E. Suzuki. Discovering interesting exception rules with rule pair. In ECML/PKDD Workshop on Advances in Inductive Rule Learning, pages 163-178,2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  87. P.-N. Tan, V. Kumar, and J. Srivastava. Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In The Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on KDD, pages 32-41, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  88. P-N. Tan, V. Kumar, and J. Srivastava. Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis. Information Systems, 4(29):293-313, 2004.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  89. A. Totohasina, H. Ralambondrainy, and J. Diatta. Notes sur les mesures proba-bilistes de la qualitĆ© des rĆØgles dā€™association: un algorithme efficace dā€™extraction des rĆØgles dā€™association implicative. In 7ĆØme Colloque Africain sur la Recherche en Informatique, pages 511-518, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  90. B. Vaillant. Evaluation de connaissances: le problĆØme du choix dā€™une mesure de qualitĆ© en extraction de connaissances Ć  partir des donnĆ©es. Masterā€™s thesis, Ecole Nationale SupĆ©rieure des TĆ©lĆ©communications de Bretagne, 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  91. B. Vaillant, P. Lenca, and S. Lallich. Association rule interestingness measures: an experimental study. Technical Report LUSSI-TR-2004-02-EN, DĆ©partement LUSSI, ENST Bretagne, 2004.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  92. B. Vaillant, P. Lenca, and S. Lallich. A clustering of interestingness measures. In E. Suzuki and S. Arikawa, editors, Discovery Science, volume 3245 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 290ā€“297, Padova, Italy, 2004. SpringerVerlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  93. B. Vaillant, P. Picouet, and P. Lenca. An extensible platform for rule quality measure benchmarking. In R. Bisdorff, editor, Human Centered Processes, pages 187ā€“191, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  94. H. Xiong, P. Tan, and V. Kumar. Mining strong affinity association patterns in data sets with skewed support distribution. In Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 387ā€“394, Melbourne, Florida, 2003.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  95. T. Zhang. Association rules. In T. Terano, H. Liu, and A.L.P. Chen, editors, 4th Pacific-Asia Conference Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Current Issues and New Applications, volume 1805 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Kyoto, Japan, 2000. Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  96. A. Zimmermann and L. De Raedt. CorClass: Correlated association rule mining for classification. In E. Suzuki and S. Arikawa, editors, Discovery Science, volume 3245 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 60ā€“72, Padova, Italy, 2004. Springer-Verlag..

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenca, P., Vaillant, B., Meyer, P., Lallich, S. (2007). Association Rule Interestingness Measures: Experimental and Theoretical Studies. In: Guillet, F.J., Hamilton, H.J. (eds) Quality Measures in Data Mining. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 43. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44918-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44918-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44911-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44918-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics