Skip to main content

Communication for Goal Directed Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication in Multiagent Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2650))

Abstract

This paper discusses some modeling issues concerning the communication between goal-directed agents. In particular, the role of performatives in agent communication is discussed. It is argued that the specification of the effect of performatives, as prescribed by FIPA, is sometimes too weak or unrealistic. The alternative, proposed in this paper, suggests a two phase modeling of the effect of the communication. A minimum effect can be hardwired in the semantics of sending and receiving messages. And the performative related part is achieved by executing a number of rules which are under the control of the agent and made accessible to the agent programmer. These issues are discussed in the context of 3APL which is a goal directed agent programming language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dignum, F., Greaves, M.: Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS, vol. 1916. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Finin, T., Labrou, Y., Mayfield, J.: KQML as an agent communication language. In: Bradshaw, J. (ed.) Software Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. FIPA, http://www.fipa.org/

  4. Hindriks, K., de Boer, F., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.: Semantics of communicating agents based on deduction and abduction. In: IJCAI 1999, Workshop on Agent Communication Languages (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hindriks, K.V., Boer, F.S.D., der Hoek, W.V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Agent programming in 3APL. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(4), 357–401 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Eijk, R., de Boer, F., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.: Generalised objectoriented concepts for inter-agent communication. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1986, pp. 260–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wooldridge, M.: Semantic issues in the verification of agent communication languages. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 9–32 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dastani, M., van der Ham, J., Dignum, F. (2003). Communication for Goal Directed Agents. In: Huget, MP. (eds) Communication in Multiagent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2650. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40385-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44972-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics