Skip to main content

Decision Making Based on Sampled Disease Occurrence in Animal Herds

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2711))

  • 802 Accesses

Abstract

To make qualified decisions when extrapolating results from a survey sample with imprecise tests requires careful handling of uncertainty. Both the imprecise test and uncertainty introduced by the sampling have to be taken into account in order to act optimally. This paper formulates an influence diagram with discrete and continuous nodes to handle an example typical for animal production: a veterinarian who – as part of a biosecurity program – has to decide whether to treat a herd of animals after inspecting a small fraction of them.

Our aim is to investigate the robustness of the obtained strategy by performing a two-way sensitivity analysis with respect to the proportion of false positives and false negatives of the test. Output of the analysis is a treatment map illustrating how the chosen strategy varies according to variation in these proportions. The map helps to investigate whether a certain variation is acceptable or if the test procedure has to be standardized in order to reduce variation. Objective of the paper is to be an appetizer to work more with the issues raised in obtaining a practical solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, V.: Sample survey: Principles and methods. Edward Arnold, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous: U.S Voluntary Johne’s Disease Herd Status Program for Cattle. Technical report, United States Animal Health Association (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alban, L., Stege, H., Dahl, J.: The new classification system for slaughter pig-herds in the danish salmonella surveillance-and-control program. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1659, 1–14 (2001) (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baadsgaard, N.P.: Development of Clinical Monitoring Methods in Pig Health Management. PhD thesis, Department of Clinical Studies, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University and Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Research Center Foulum (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kristensen, K.: A collection of some statistical issues to consider when testing for GM seeds in conventional seed lots. Technical report, Biometry Research Unit, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clement, R.: Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, W., Su, C.L., Gardner, I.: Sample size calculations for surveys to substantiate freedom of populations from infectious agents (2002) (submitted to Biometrics)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson, T., Johnson, W., Gardner, I., Georgiadis, M.: Determining the infection status of a herd. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (2003) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coupé, V.M.H., van der Gaag, L.C.: Practicable sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks. Technical Report UU-CS-1998-10, Utrecht University, Department of Computer Science (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen, T.D., Jensen, F.V.: Sensitivity analysis in influence diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics (2001) (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Höhle, M., Kristiansen, B.: Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian networks and influence diagrams (1998), http://www.dina.dk/~hoehle/pubs/sensitivity.pdf

  12. Waterloo Maple Inc.: Maple 6.02 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lauritzen, S.L.: Graphical Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N.: WinBUGS Version 1.2 User Manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cameron, A., Baldock, F.: A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Prev. Vet. Medicine 34, 1–17 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lauritzen, S.L., Nilsson, D.: Representing and solving decision problems with limited information. Management Science 47, 1235–1251 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charnes, J., Shenoy, P.: A forward Monte Carlo method for solving influence diagrams using local computation. Working paper No. 273, School of Business, University of Kansas (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bielza, C., Müller, P., Insua, D.: Decision analysis by augmented probability simulation. Management Science 45, 995–1007 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Höhle, M., Jørgensen, E. (2003). Decision Making Based on Sampled Disease Occurrence in Animal Herds. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2711. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40494-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45062-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics