Skip to main content

Active Sampling Strategies for Multihypothesis Testing

  • Conference paper
Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (EMMCVPR 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2683))

Abstract

This paper presents a rationale for the design of optimal sequential sampling procedures for multi-hypothesis discrimination where a system selectively queries the environment based on the current state of the discrimination process.

The environment is modelled as a controlled i.i.d. process conditionned by various hypotheses. Recognition is achieved when the test identifies the correct hypothesis describing the environment behavior.

As the testing proceeds, hypotheses may be rejected with infinite confidence when feature values with zero probability are observed. The sampling strategy is stationary but is updated each time a hypothesis is rejected. It is chosen according to a criterion measuring the recognition error speed of convergence to zero when the number of samples goes to infinity. This criterion is obtained by Large Deviation Theory techniques and characterizes globally the multi-hypothesis discrimination problem. An application on 2D rotation invariant shape recognition with non-closed noisy contours illustrates the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breiman, L., Stone, C., Olshen, R., Friedman, J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Amit, Y., Geman, D.: Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural Computation 9, 1545–1588 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geman, D., Jedynak, B.: An active testing model for tracking roads in satellite images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18, 1–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azencott, R., Vayatis, N.: Refined exponential rates in Vapnik-Chervonenkis inequalities. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Math., Ser. I 332, 563–568 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuille, A., Coughlan, J., Wu, Y., Zhu, S.: Order parameters for detecting target curves in images: When does high level knowledge help? International Journal of Computer Vision 41, 9–33 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, Y., Zhu, S., Liu, X.: Equivalence of julesz ensembles and FRAME models. International Journal of Computer Vision 38, 245–261 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herbin, S.: Recognizing 3D objects by generating random actions. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 35–40 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbin, S.: Combining geometric and probabilistic structure for active recognition of 3D objects. In: Burkhardt, H., Neumann, B. (eds.) ECCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1407, pp. 748–764. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Herbin, S.: Similarity measures between feature maps - application to texture comparison. In: Proceedings of the Texture 2002 workshop, pp. 67–72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berge, C.: Graphes et hypergraphes. Dunod (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kazakos, D.: Asymptotic error probability expressions for multihypothesis testing using multisensor data. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 21, 1101–1114 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dembo, A., Zeitouni, O.: Large Deviations Techniques and Applications. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Loncaric, S.: A survey of shape analysis techniques. Pattern Recognition 31, 983–1001 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amir, A., Lindenbaum, M.: A generic grouping algorithm and its quantitative analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 168–185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Olson, C., Huttenlocher, D.: Automatic target recognition by matching oriented edge pixels. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 6, 103–113 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimkin, N.: Extremal large deviations in controlled i.i.d. processes with applications to hypothesis testing. Adv. Appl. Probab. 25, 875–894 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herbin, S. (2003). Active Sampling Strategies for Multihypothesis Testing. In: Rangarajan, A., Figueiredo, M., Zerubia, J. (eds) Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. EMMCVPR 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45063-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45063-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40498-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45063-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics