Skip to main content

Schematic Saturation for Decision and Unification Problems

  • Conference paper
Automated Deduction – CADE-19 (CADE 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2741))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 351 Accesses

Abstract

We show that if a set of clauses S is finitely saturated by the Resolution inference system, and if SN can be finitely saturated by Resolution, then S can be saturated in polynomial time, for any ground substitution θ. If N contains only unit clauses consisting of predicate symbols with distinct variables as arguments, then this implies the polynomial time decidability of ground unit clauses modulo S. But for a given N, this implies decidability modulo S of clauses of a particular structure. In addition, if S is a set of Horn clauses, and if a negative literal is selected in each clause containing one, then this implies the polynomial time solvability of the unification problem for the theory modulo S. We also consider the unification problem, where only certain positions of a clause are allowed to contain variables. We mark those positions, and show that if SN can be finitely saturated, under a modification of the duplicate removal rule, then S, can be saturated in exponential time for any ground substitution θ, and therefore the unification problem modulo S is solvable in exponential time for such goals. However, if we further restrict the conditions, then unification is solvable in polynomial time for such goals. The theories of membership, append and addition fall into this last class. Therefore, unifiability in the theory of membership, append, and addition is decidable in polynomial time for unit clauses if the last position of the predicate is ground.

This work was supported by NSF grant number CCR-0098270.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armando, A., Ranise, S., Rusinowitch, M.: Uniform Derivation of Decision Procedures by Superposition. In: Fribourg, L. (ed.) CSL 2001 and EACSL 2001. LNCS, vol. 2142, pp. 513–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Resolution theorem proving. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 19–99. North Holland, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Basin, D., Ganzinger, H.: Automated complexity analysis based on ordered resolution. J. Association for Computing Machinery 48(1), 70–109 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowling, W., Gallier, J.: Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional horn formulae. Journal of Logic Programming 3, 267–284 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganzinger, H.: Relating Semantic and Proof-Theoretic Concepts for Polynomial Time Decidability of Uniform Word Problems. In: Proceedings 16th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2001, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lynch, C., Morawska, B.: Automatic Decidability. In: Proceedings 17th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2002, pp. 7–16. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. McAllester, D.: Automated Recognition of Tractability in Inference Relations. Journal of the ACM 40(2), 284–303 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nieuwenhuis, R.: Basic paramodulation and decidable theories (Extended abstract). In: Proceedings 11th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 1996, pp. 473–482. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Shankar, N.: Little Engines of Proof. In: Proceedings 17th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2002, p. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lynch, C. (2003). Schematic Saturation for Decision and Unification Problems. In: Baader, F. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-19. CADE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2741. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40559-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45085-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics