Skip to main content

On Converting CNF to DNF

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003 (MFCS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2747))

Abstract

We study how big the blow-up in size can be when one switches between the CNF and DNF representations of boolean functions. For a function f:{0,1}n →{0,1}, \({\mathsf{cnfsize}}\left(f\right)\) denotes the minimum number of clauses in a CNF for f; similarly, \({\mathsf{dnfsize}}\left(f\right)\) denotes the minimum number of terms in a DNF for f. For 0≤ m ≤ 2n − 1, let \({\mathsf{dnfsize}}\left(m,n\right)\) be the maximum \({\mathsf{dnfsize}}\left(f\right)\) for a function f:{0,1}n →{0,1} with \({\mathsf{cnfsize}}\left(f\right) \leq m\). We show that there are constants c 1,c 2 ≥ 1 and ε > 0, such that for all large n and all \(m \in [ \frac{1}{\epsilon}n,2^{\epsilon{n}}]\), we have

$$ 2^{n -- c_1\frac{n}{\log(m/n)}}~ \leq~ {\mathsf{dnfsize}}(m,n) ~\leq~ 2^{n-c_2 \frac{n}{\log(m/n)}}.$$

In particular, when m is the polynomial n c, we get \({\mathsf{dnfsize}} (n^c,n) = 2^{n -\theta(c^{-1}\frac{n}{\log n})}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beame, P.: A switching lemma primer. Technical Report UW-CSE-95-07-01, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington (November 1994), Available online at www.cs.washington.edu/homes/beame/

  2. Chvátal, V.: The tail of the hypergeometric distribution. Discrete Mathematics 25, 285–287 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollig, B., Wegener, I.: A very simple function that requires exponential size read-once branching programs. Information Processing Letters 66, 53–57 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dantsin, E., Goerdt, A., Hirsch, E.A., Schöning, U.: Deterministic algorithms for k-SAT based on covering codes and local search. In: Welzl, E., Montanari, U., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) ICALP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1853, pp. 236–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dantsin, E., Goerdt, A., Hirsch, E.A., Kannan, R., Kleinberg, J., Papadimitriou, C., Raghavan, P., Schöning, U.: A deterministic (2 − 2/(k + 1)n algorithm for k-SAT based on local search. Theoretical Computer Science (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Håstad, J.: Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits. In: Micali, S. (ed.) Randomness and Computation. Advances in Computing Research, vol. 5, pp. 143–170. JAI Press, Greenwich (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hofmeister, T., Schöning, U., Schuler, R., Watanabe, O.: A probabilistic 3-SAT algorithm further improved. In: Alt, H., Ferreira, A. (eds.) STACS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2285, pp. 192–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Katajainen, J., Madsen, J.N.: Performance tuning an algorithm for compressing relational tables. In: Penttonen, M., Schmidt, E.M. (eds.) SWAT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2368, pp. 398–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Monien, B., Speckenmeyer, E.: Solving satisfiability in less than 2n steps. Discrete Applied Mathematics 10, 287–295 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Paturi, R., Pudlàk, P., Saks, M.E., Zane, F.: An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 628–637 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quine, W.V.O.: On cores and prime implicants of truth functions. American Mathematics Monthly 66, 755–760 (1959)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Razborov, A., Rudich, S.: Natural proofs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55, 24–35 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Schöning, U.: A probabilistic algorithm for k-SAT based on limited local search and restart. Algorithmica 32, 615–623 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Voigt, B., Wegener, I.: Minimal polynomials for the conjunctions of functions on disjoint variables an be very simple. Information and Computation 83, 65–79 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Wegener, I.: The Complexity of Boolean Functions. Wiley, Chichester (1987), Freely available via http://ls2-www.cs.uni-dortmund.de/~wegener

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wegener, I.: Branching Programs and Binary Decision Diagrams – Theory and Applications. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miltersen, P.B., Radhakrishnan, J., Wegener, I. (2003). On Converting CNF to DNF. In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003. MFCS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45138-9_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45138-9_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45138-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics