Skip to main content

The Complexity of Checking Consistency of Pedigree Information and Related Problems

  • Conference paper
Theoretical Computer Science (ICTCS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2841))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Consistency checking is a fundamental computational problem in genetics. Given a pedigree and information on the genotypes (of some) of the individuals in it, the aim of consistency checking is to determine whether these data are consistent with the classic Mendelian laws of inheritance. This problem arose originally from the geneticists’ need to filter their input data from erroneous information, and is well motivated from both a biological and a sociological viewpoint. This paper shows that consistency checking is NP-complete, even with focus on a single gene and in the presence of three alleles. Several other results on the computational complexity of problems from genetics that are related to consistency checking are also offered. In particular, it is shown that checking the consistency of pedigrees over two alleles, and of pedigrees without loops, can be done in polynomial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abecasis, G.R., Cherny, S.S., Cookson, W.O., Cardon, L.R.: Merlin: Rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nature Genetics 30, 97–101 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aceto, L., Hansen, J.A., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Johnsen, J., Knudsen, J.: The complexity of checking consistency of pedigree information and related problems, Research Report RS–03–17, BRICS (2003), Available from http://www.brics.dk/RS/03/17/

  3. Bryant, R.: Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-35, 677–691 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Decode News Center (November 2001), http://www.decode.com/news/releases/

  5. Gu, J., Purdom, P.W., Franco, J., Wah, B.W.: Algorithms for the satisfiability (SAT) problem: a survey. In: Satisfiability problem: theory and applications (Piscataway, NJ, 1996). DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci, vol. 35, pp. 19–151. Amer. Math. Soc, Providence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gudbjartsson, D.F., Jonasson, K., Kong, C.A.: Fast multipoint linkage calculation with Allegro. Nature Genetics 20, 12–13 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klug And, W.S., Cummings, M.R.: Concepts of Genetics, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kruglyak, L., Daly, M.J., Reeve-Daly, M.P., Lander, E.S.: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. American Journal of Human Genetics 58, 1347–1363 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lange, K., Goradia, T.M.: An algorithm for automatic genotype elimination. American Journal of Human Genetics 40, 250–256 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J., Jiang, T.: Efficient rule-based haplotyping algorithms for pedigree data [extended abstract]. In: Proceedings of RECOMB 2003, Berlin, Germany, April 10-13, pp. 197–206. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connell, J.R., Weeks, D.E.: Pedcheck: A program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 259–266 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connell, J.R., Weeks, D.E.: An optimal algorithm for automatic genotype elimination. American Journal of Human Genetics 65, 1733–1740 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piccolboni, A., Gusfield, D.: On the complexity of fundamental computational problems in pedigree analysis, Tech. Rep. CSE-99-8, Computer Science Department, University of California, Davis (September 1999); Revised version to appear in the Journal of Computational Biology

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sobel, E., Papp, J.C., Lange, K.: Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics 70, 496–508 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strachan, T., Read, A.P.: Human Molecular Genetics 2. Wiley-Liss, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valiant, L.G.: The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8, 189–201 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aceto, L., Hansen, J.A., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Johnsen, J., Knudsen, J. (2003). The Complexity of Checking Consistency of Pedigree Information and Related Problems. In: Blundo, C., Laneve, C. (eds) Theoretical Computer Science. ICTCS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2841. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45208-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45208-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20216-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45208-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics