Skip to main content

Logical Resolving for Security Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Computer Network Security (MMM-ACNS 2003)

Abstract

The paper discusses approach for testing security policies enforcement and weakness and enterprises it’s implementation for keeping assurance in system protection. Using such techniques it is possible to examine the protections of thousands of security-related objects on a multi-user system and identify security drawbacks. By acting on this information, security officer or system administrator can significantly reduce their system security exposure. The document examines theoretical foundations for design the safety evaluation toolkit. Finally, paper describes a functional structure of the integrated evaluation workshop based on the security analyzing kernel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jajodia, S., Samarati, P., Subrahmanian, V.S.: A Logical Language for Expressing Authorizations. In: Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoagland, J.A., Panday, R., Levitt, K.N.: Security Policy Specification Using a Graphical Approach. Tech. report CSE-98-3, UC Davis Computer Science Dept. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: The Ponder Policy Specification Language. In: Proc. Policy 2001: Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, Bristol, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Security policies and security models. In: Proc. of the 1982 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McLean, J.: Reasoning about security models. In: Proc. of the 1987 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLean, J.: The Algebra of Security. In: Proc. 1988 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (April 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McLean, J.: Security models and information flow. In: Proc. 1990 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (May 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, D., LaPadula, L.: Secure Computer Systems: Unified Exposition and Multics Interpretation, Technical Report, MTR-2997, MITRE, Bedford, Mass (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison, M., Ruzzo, W., Ullman, J.: Protection in operating systems. Communications of the ACM 19(8), 461–471 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bratko, I.: PROLOG Programming for Artificial Intelligence, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Pub Co, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zegzhda, P.D., Zegzhda, D.P., Kalinin, M.O. (2003). Logical Resolving for Security Evaluation. In: Gorodetsky, V., Popyack, L., Skormin, V. (eds) Computer Network Security. MMM-ACNS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2776. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45215-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45215-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40797-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45215-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics