Skip to main content

Checking and Reasoning about Semantic Web through Alloy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
FME 2003: Formal Methods (FME 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2805))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

Semantic Web (SW), commonly regarded as the next generation of the Web, is an emerging vision of the new Web from the Knowledge Representation and the Web communities. The Formal Methods community can also play an important role to contribute to SW development. Reasoning and consistency checking can be useful at many stages during the design, maintenance and deployment of SW ontology. However the existing reasoning and consistency checking tools for SW are primitive. We believe that formal techniques and tools, such as Alloy, can provide automatic reasoning and consistency checking services for SW. In this paper, we firstly construct semantic models for the SW language (DAML+OIL) in Alloy, and these models form the semantic domain for interpreting DAML+OIL in Alloy. Then we develop the translation techniques and tools which can automatically map the SW ontology into the DAML+OIL semantic domain in Alloy. Furthermore, with the assistance of Alloy Analyzer (AA) we demonstrate that the consistency of the SW ontology can be checked automatically and different kinds of reasoning tasks can be supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web, May 2001. Scientific American (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V. (eds). Resource description framework (rdf) schema specification 1.0. (March 2000), http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/

  3. Broekstra, J., Klein, M., Decker, S., Fensel, D., Horrocks, I.: Adding formal semantics to the web: building on top of rdf schema. In: ECDL Workshop on the Semantic Web: Models, Architectures and Management (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dong, J.S., Sun, J., Wang, H.: Semantic Web for Extending and Linking Formalisms. In: Eriksson, L.-H., Lindsay, P.A. (eds.) FME 2002. LNCS, vol. 2391, p. 587. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, J.S., Sun, J., Wang, H.: Z Approach to Semantic Web Services. In: George, C.W., Miao, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2495, p. 156. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, J.S., Sun, J., Wang, H., Lee, C.H., Lee, H.B.: Analysing web ontology in alloy: A military case study. In: Proc. 15th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: SEKE2003, San Francisco, USA (July 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fikes, R., McGuinness, D.L.: An axiomatic semantics for rdf, rdf schema, and daml+oil. Technical Report KSL-01-01, Knowledge Systems Laboratory (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horrocks, I.: The FaCT system. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, pp. 307–312. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, D.: Micromodels of software: Lightweight modelling and analysis with alloy (2002), Available http://sdg.lcs.mit.edu/alloy/book_OnlinePDF.pdf

  10. Jackson, D., Schechter, I., Shlyakhter, I.: Alcoa: the alloy constraint analyzer. In: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering: ICSE 2000, Limerick, Ireland, June 2000, pp. 730–733. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lassila, O., Swick, R.R. (editors). Resource description framework (rdf) model and syntax specification (February 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/

  12. Lee, C.H.: Phase I Report for Plan Ontology. DSO National Labs, Singapore (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mascolo, C., Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A.: XML technologies and software engineering. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 775–776 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Harmelen, F., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Horrocks, I. (eds.): Reference description of the daml+oil ontology markup language. Contributors: Berners- Lee, T., Brickley, D., Connolly, D., Dean, M., Decker, S., Hayes, P., Heflin, J., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., McGuinness, D., Stein, L.A., ... (March 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Xsl transformations (xslt) version 1.0 (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dong, J.S., Sun, J., Wang, H. (2003). Checking and Reasoning about Semantic Web through Alloy. In: Araki, K., Gnesi, S., Mandrioli, D. (eds) FME 2003: Formal Methods. FME 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2805. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45236-2_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45236-2_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40828-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45236-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics